Tools & Wizards About Us
shapetalk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

shapetalk.com

Psychology of Shortcuts Shapetalk - Raising Your Intelligence With Shapetalk and Shortcuts - EyeCandy

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

shapetalk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit shapetalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Shapetalk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shapetalk.com

Raising Your Intelligence With Psychology of Shortcuts Shapetalk. Raising your intelligence by choice. Mister-Shortcut and your Psychology of Shortcuts with Shapetalk EyeCandy and shortcuts. Enjoy Sha...

Visit shapetalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shapetalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shapetalk.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,170 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shapetalk.com

125 ms

mister-shortcuts.js

47 ms

a-NXodDLR7Y

110 ms

foodboosters-34.jpg

435 ms

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Shapetalk.com, 30% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 22% (6 requests) were made to Foodboosters.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (708 ms) relates to the external source Foodboosters.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

488.4 kB

After Optimization

404.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shapetalk.com main page is 488.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 164.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 76.6 kB

  • Original 101.4 kB
  • After minification 100.8 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 162.9 kB
  • After minification 158.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shapetalk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 164.9 kB
  • After minification 164.9 kB
  • After compression 162.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 59.2 kB
  • After compression 59.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shapetalk.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (26%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shapetalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shapetalk.com

shapetalk.com

125 ms

mister-shortcuts.js

mister-shortcuts.js

47 ms

a-NXodDLR7Y

a-NXodDLR7Y

110 ms

foodboosters-34.jpg

foodboosters-34.jpg

435 ms

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

22 ms

Dd2KlGAbnqY

Dd2KlGAbnqY

1 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

21 ms

foodboosters-2-salad.jpg

foodboosters-2-salad.jpg

600 ms

foodboosters-3.jpg

foodboosters-3.jpg

601 ms

food.gif

food.gif

31 ms

Dd2KlGAbnqY

Dd2KlGAbnqY

156 ms

MocSPUDQUss

MocSPUDQUss

387 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

6 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

24 ms

base.js

base.js

60 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

407 ms

foodboosters-34.jpg

foodboosters-34.jpg

708 ms

YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js

YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js

284 ms

embed.js

embed.js

168 ms

foodboosters-2-salad.jpg

foodboosters-2-salad.jpg

644 ms

foodboosters-3.jpg

foodboosters-3.jpg

643 ms

id

id

61 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

77 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

391 ms

Create

Create

334 ms

Create

Create

338 ms

Create

Create

448 ms

Accessibility Review

shapetalk.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

shapetalk.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shapetalk.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shapetalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shapetalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

shapetalk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shapetalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: