Tools & Wizards About Us
sharkasp.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

sharkasp.net

SharkASP.NET - Affortable ASP.NET Hosting, Core Hosting, MVC Hosting, Free ASP.NET Hosting

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

762 ms

sharkasp.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SharkASP content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sharkasp.net

SharkASP.NET offers unlimited ASP.net Hosting, Core Hosting, MVC & Nopcommerce hosting plans with a Free temporary URL. Try our free plan today! Credit Card not required.

Visit sharkasp.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sharkasp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sharkasp.net performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sharkasp.net

279 ms

www.sharkasp.net

218 ms

www.sharkasp.net

499 ms

bootstrap.min.css

73 ms

minireset.min.css

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Sharkasp.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (499 ms) belongs to the original domain Sharkasp.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sharkasp.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 37.6 kB
  • After minification 29.4 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 53.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SharkASP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 125.1 kB
  • After minification 124.9 kB
  • After compression 110.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 57.4 kB
  • After compression 51.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharkasp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (70%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SharkASP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sharkasp.net

sharkasp.net

279 ms

www.sharkasp.net

www.sharkasp.net

218 ms

www.sharkasp.net

www.sharkasp.net

499 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

73 ms

minireset.min.css

minireset.min.css

136 ms

css

css

41 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

35 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

201 ms

custom.css

custom.css

247 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

250 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

252 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

253 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

259 ms

style.css

style.css

265 ms

style2.css

style2.css

307 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

375 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

316 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

427 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

320 ms

parsley.min.js

parsley.min.js

328 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

366 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

426 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

426 ms

menu.js

menu.js

426 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

460 ms

chatbottombutton.png

chatbottombutton.png

152 ms

sharkasp_logo.png

sharkasp_logo.png

298 ms

sharkasp_logo.jpg

sharkasp_logo.jpg

298 ms

serverimg.png

serverimg.png

151 ms

font

font

175 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

115 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

114 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

218 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

173 ms

banner-image.jpg

banner-image.jpg

370 ms

home-features.png

home-features.png

117 ms

loader0.js

loader0.js

116 ms

font

font

24 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

123 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

23 ms

app.js

app.js

47 ms

8133-389-10-5171.js

8133-389-10-5171.js

32 ms

Accessibility Review

sharkasp.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sharkasp.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sharkasp.net SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharkasp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharkasp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sharkasp.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SharkASP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: