1.9 sec in total
34 ms
1 sec
837 ms
Visit sharpepoint.com now to see the best up-to-date Sharpe Point content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharpepoint.com
At SharpePoint Private Client Group, finance is our first language. We craft custom plans to meet your financial life goals and build a sustainable future.
Visit sharpepoint.comWe analyzed Sharpepoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sharpepoint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value18.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value3,630 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.2 s
0/100
10%
34 ms
34 ms
65 ms
319 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Sharpepoint.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (634 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 477.8 kB (8%)
5.8 MB
5.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Sharpepoint.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sharpe Point images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharpepoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (61%)
61
24
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharpe Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sharpepoint.com
34 ms
sharpepoint.com
34 ms
css2
65 ms
all.js
319 ms
style.min.css
23 ms
style.css
22 ms
styles-static.css
31 ms
formreset.min.css
31 ms
formsmain.min.css
34 ms
readyclass.min.css
33 ms
browsers.min.css
42 ms
pum-site-styles.css
61 ms
jquery.min.js
41 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
40 ms
jquery.json.min.js
40 ms
gravityforms.min.js
63 ms
api.js
62 ms
utils.min.js
47 ms
js
94 ms
plugins.min.js
59 ms
appX.js
46 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
57 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
58 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
67 ms
dom-ready.min.js
65 ms
hooks.min.js
66 ms
i18n.min.js
65 ms
a11y.min.js
68 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
71 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
72 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
73 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
74 ms
core.min.js
74 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
82 ms
app.min.css
66 ms
themeX.css
76 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
319 ms
logo.png
225 ms
2-layers@2x-scaled-e1607185072359.jpg
232 ms
stock-photo-mature-woman-hugging-her-husband-1194118255@2x-1024x1011.jpg
242 ms
barrons.png
224 ms
Forbes_logo.svg
226 ms
The_Wall_Street_Journal.png
232 ms
U.S._News.png
234 ms
crude2.png
281 ms
Bitmap@2x-90x90.jpg
252 ms
2-layers@2x-4-scaled-e1666650453522-690x457.jpg
251 ms
2-layers@2x.jpg
281 ms
2-layers@2x-1.jpg
303 ms
2-layers@2x-2.jpg
304 ms
SynerG@2x.png
284 ms
money-check@2x.png
284 ms
shield@2x.png
284 ms
bullseye-arrow@2x.png
301 ms
GettyImages-973304930@2x-1024x913.jpg
306 ms
stock-photo-mature-couple-driving-along-country-road-in-open-top-car-229736836@2x.jpg
379 ms
arrow-right.png
304 ms
logo-footer.png
306 ms
N0b52SlTPu5rIkWIZjVKKtYtfxYqZ4RJBFzFfYUjkSDdlqZgy7LYxnLy.ttf
285 ms
N0b52SlTPu5rIkWIZjVKKtYtfxYqZ4RJBFzFfYUjkSDdlqZgy7LqxnLy.ttf
408 ms
N0b52SlTPu5rIkWIZjVKKtYtfxYqZ4RJBFzFfYUjkSDdlqZgy7IGwXLy.ttf
634 ms
N0b52SlTPu5rIkWIZjVKKtYtfxYqZ4RJBFzFfYUjkSDdlqZgy7I_wXLy.ttf
410 ms
N0b52SlTPu5rIkWIZjVKKtYtfxYqZ4RJBFzFfYUjkSDdlqZgy7JYwXLy.ttf
409 ms
O4ZMFGj5hxF0EhjimngomvnCCtqb30OX7jTiDA.ttf
368 ms
O4ZMFGj5hxF0EhjimngomvnCCtqb30OX1zTiDA.ttf
376 ms
O4ZMFGj5hxF0EhjimngomvnCCtqb30OXsDTiDA.ttf
433 ms
O4ZMFGj5hxF0EhjimngomvnCCtqb30OXAjPiDA.ttf
377 ms
O4ZMFGj5hxF0EhjimngomvnCCtqb30OXMDPiDA.ttf
406 ms
recaptcha__en.js
155 ms
js
70 ms
analytics.js
119 ms
collect
21 ms
sharpepoint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sharpepoint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sharpepoint.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharpepoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharpepoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sharpepoint.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sharpe Point. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: