3.7 sec in total
119 ms
3.2 sec
327 ms
Visit sharpeware.com now to see the best up-to-date Sharpeware content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharpeware.com
Excellent duplicate finder tools - remove file duplicates, unused and unwanted files with this great storage management suite
Visit sharpeware.comWe analyzed Sharpeware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sharpeware.com performance score
119 ms
70 ms
89 ms
52 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Sharpeware.com, 49% (35 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 23% (16 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (67%)
3.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sharpeware.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sharpeware images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharpeware.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (63%)
62
23
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharpeware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sharpeware.com
119 ms
www.sharpeware.com
70 ms
bt
89 ms
require.min.js
52 ms
main-r.min.js
55 ms
viewer.css
69 ms
dynamicmodel
25 ms
21f7da_7d284787939709400095e2733f4e32d6_373.json.z
297 ms
21f7da_5f1c1afd3119b2542cd80b3dfc9ac5a5_373.json.z
344 ms
ugc-viewer
52 ms
bt
91 ms
skins.min.js
344 ms
components.min.js
282 ms
utils.min.js
81 ms
core.min.js
82 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
199 ms
lodash.min.js
30 ms
TweenMax.min.js
51 ms
layout.min.js
147 ms
tpa.min.js
80 ms
fonts.min.js
147 ms
animations.min.js
198 ms
swfobject.min.js
155 ms
mousetrap.min.js
146 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
147 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
146 ms
react-dom.min.js
147 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
149 ms
widgets.min.js
150 ms
experiment.js
151 ms
render.min.js
152 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
191 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
271 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
192 ms
zepto.min.js
187 ms
color.min.js
187 ms
bt
99 ms
dc.js
79 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
12 ms
bt
568 ms
latin.css
43 ms
21f7da_fb56d5f3d2c74a1fb940bbbbe3d008ca.gif
339 ms
apple_box.png
222 ms
css
214 ms
__utm.gif
166 ms
21f7da_675d9e6db80a4e03b6f00ea1d1b3f9fe.png
138 ms
21f7da_79073627b294416f8bbafa5c0d415963.png
135 ms
21f7da_485b4081216e437f9ced2735c72d3dfe.png
172 ms
21f7da_c94e808b76054bee862cde53e8aed4f6.png
357 ms
21f7da_baff0748a54947eb9c006f7cd1ef4533.png
341 ms
21f7da_042f86798ed3414b8384080cb635b481.png
339 ms
21f7da_9b4c499ff4a340d5b2c5abc372064d0b.png
367 ms
21f7da_aa5d442cbd814a38b9958c43b94c5bec.png
418 ms
21f7da_a27cad913a09487b969cad85b9ed9ceb.png
416 ms
21f7da_dcae237532184250a83cd3b03b06602b.png
553 ms
21f7da_b4ab3a00d3f94e098782f43ee0ef091e.png
489 ms
8d2c2a4846503b9067e2fd2f590445c2.wix_mp
359 ms
21f7da_66ce181b17ed49c39e98823532ea2975.gif
1750 ms
bt
132 ms
bt
131 ms
bt
131 ms
arrows_white_new3.png
132 ms
like.php
320 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
103 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
111 ms
4cefdf47-0136-4169-9933-3225dbbec9d9.woff
101 ms
PeTTkHQKj5rUPVxkIGAoaw.ttf
112 ms
j7wx-rRiDuE-JcaZ1ilpKg.ttf
113 ms
ugc-viewer
52 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
486 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
550 ms
sharpeware.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharpeware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sharpeware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sharpeware.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sharpeware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: