Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

sharxsecurity.com

Sharx Security: Premium IP cameras and network video recorders

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

728 ms

Page Rendered

617 ms

sharxsecurity.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sharxsecurity.com now to see the best up-to-date Sharx Security content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharxsecurity.com

Sharx Security is a leading manufacturer of network cameras and megapixel surveillance cameras offering a large selection of PoE IP cameras for security, surveillance, remote monitoring and live strea...

Visit sharxsecurity.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sharxsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sharxsecurity.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sharxsecurity.com

84 ms

sharxsecurity.com

91 ms

css

41 ms

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

material-kit.min.css

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Sharxsecurity.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) belongs to the original domain Sharxsecurity.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 936.1 kB (28%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Sharxsecurity.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 97.4 kB

  • Original 120.8 kB
  • After minification 99.9 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sharx Security images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 410.9 kB

  • Original 545.4 kB
  • After minification 395.8 kB
  • After compression 134.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 410.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 351.5 kB

  • Original 411.0 kB
  • After minification 408.2 kB
  • After compression 59.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharxsecurity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 351.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (51%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharx Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sharxsecurity.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sharxsecurity.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sharxsecurity.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharxsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharxsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sharx Security. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: