Tools & Wizards About Us
sheratonlabels.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sheratonlabels.com

Label Printers Calgary | Home | Sheraton Labels Inc.

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

519 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

sheratonlabels.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sheratonlabels.com homepage info - get ready to check Sheraton Labels best content right away, or after learning these important things about sheratonlabels.com

At Sheraton Labels Inc., we are professional label printers in Calgary, and we provide quality design and printing services for many different businesses in Southern Alberta and Western Canada.

Visit sheratonlabels.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sheratonlabels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sheratonlabels.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sheratonlabels.com

519 ms

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

66 ms

polyfill.min.js

489 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sheratonlabels.com, 43% (23 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 28% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (774 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 801.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sheratonlabels.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 274.2 kB

  • Original 348.8 kB
  • After minification 347.1 kB
  • After compression 74.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 274.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 465.6 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 944.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sheraton Labels needs image optimization as it can save up to 465.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 61.9 kB

  • Original 297.0 kB
  • After minification 297.0 kB
  • After compression 235.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (30%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sheraton Labels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sheratonlabels.com

www.sheratonlabels.com

519 ms

minified.js

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

66 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

489 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

61 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

65 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

64 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

63 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

66 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

63 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

63 ms

ba2cd3_7311781a986245bca5b3bc502ebc5ae9~mv2.png

ba2cd3_7311781a986245bca5b3bc502ebc5ae9~mv2.png

179 ms

ba2cd3_1c4d28d582d54558be545b5f02872bd9~mv2.png

ba2cd3_1c4d28d582d54558be545b5f02872bd9~mv2.png

216 ms

ba2cd3_7ac90fcb1cbf4aebb48d6c3ca5be43fc~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_7ac90fcb1cbf4aebb48d6c3ca5be43fc~mv2.jpg

362 ms

ba2cd3_e03613462baf4948a326960ad66f7f52~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_e03613462baf4948a326960ad66f7f52~mv2.jpg

359 ms

ba2cd3_d13193c5612f49cabea70c8f8029719c~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_d13193c5612f49cabea70c8f8029719c~mv2.jpg

353 ms

ba2cd3_4fc74bd3ed9f4dc18214bd5c47e27d22~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_4fc74bd3ed9f4dc18214bd5c47e27d22~mv2.jpg

333 ms

ba2cd3_5a2392384e1940319fbd525de5e6a887~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_5a2392384e1940319fbd525de5e6a887~mv2.jpg

366 ms

ba2cd3_89d1bab275434713adbcf44d94fc7fa5~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_89d1bab275434713adbcf44d94fc7fa5~mv2.jpg

536 ms

ba2cd3_6229101357bf4c9b863bf0e370e05e55~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_6229101357bf4c9b863bf0e370e05e55~mv2.jpg

489 ms

ba2cd3_d95dc08da1184cf39cf280ca267ac866~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_d95dc08da1184cf39cf280ca267ac866~mv2.jpg

491 ms

ba2cd3_cf3975ddc2ae4739a10e592626bfd795~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_cf3975ddc2ae4739a10e592626bfd795~mv2.jpg

495 ms

ba2cd3_55f2f2a173b74ccfbbef38acffff2772~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_55f2f2a173b74ccfbbef38acffff2772~mv2.jpg

605 ms

ba2cd3_9f9e77a513e545b4ad42ea9490638635~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_9f9e77a513e545b4ad42ea9490638635~mv2.jpg

575 ms

ba2cd3_36fbea48f271487b833af08d94b6f075~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_36fbea48f271487b833af08d94b6f075~mv2.jpg

648 ms

DSC_0019_jfif.jpg

DSC_0019_jfif.jpg

623 ms

ba2cd3_4823780f56664cdca2f44f7096d68f39~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_4823780f56664cdca2f44f7096d68f39~mv2.jpg

652 ms

ba2cd3_498cc9d12ac0470da77a7116e523c78b~mv2.jpg

ba2cd3_498cc9d12ac0470da77a7116e523c78b~mv2.jpg

655 ms

ba2cd3_94719b39253f44e39bad5d59fe3a4125~mv2.png

ba2cd3_94719b39253f44e39bad5d59fe3a4125~mv2.png

774 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

65 ms

file.woff

file.woff

470 ms

file.woff

file.woff

485 ms

file.woff

file.woff

485 ms

file.woff

file.woff

485 ms

file.woff

file.woff

486 ms

98 ms

114 ms

101 ms

114 ms

110 ms

110 ms

133 ms

141 ms

160 ms

149 ms

149 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

14 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

3 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

6 ms

Accessibility Review

sheratonlabels.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sheratonlabels.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sheratonlabels.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sheratonlabels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sheratonlabels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sheratonlabels.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sheraton Labels. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: