2 sec in total
522 ms
1.4 sec
75 ms
Visit shield-access.com now to see the best up-to-date Shield Access content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shield-access.com
Visit shield-access.comWe analyzed Shield-access.com page load time and found that the first response time was 522 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
shield-access.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.269
45/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
522 ms
30 ms
33 ms
32 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Shield-access.com, 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com and 22% (9 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (522 ms) relates to the external source Shieldaccess.net.
Page size can be reduced by 583.2 kB (61%)
962.1 kB
378.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Shield-access.com main page is 962.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 706.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 572.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 572.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shield Access needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (44%)
25
14
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shield Access. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shieldaccess.net
522 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
30 ms
minified.js
33 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
82 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
69 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
156 ms
lodash.min.js
67 ms
react.production.min.js
67 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
155 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
168 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
167 ms
Asset%205_0_5x.png
256 ms
bundle.min.js
79 ms
2da56e_8d59ab1ab27b40f6aa48ee43d4361b1f~mv2.png
225 ms
2da56e_0a67ee3cf045456487422ac41502ed77~mv2.jpg
256 ms
2da56e_211fdcc644a0431f8c996f4f78670e02~mv2.png
257 ms
2da56e_627a77718d34424ba1a64cb9d626c077~mv2.png
298 ms
Optimized-gated_community_edited.jpg
233 ms
IMG_3180_edited.jpg
398 ms
Key-Card-Access-and-Security-for-Organiz.jpg
395 ms
IMG_1330_edited.jpg
410 ms
141 ms
128 ms
133 ms
133 ms
129 ms
131 ms
172 ms
171 ms
173 ms
169 ms
168 ms
174 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
20 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
14 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
6 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
6 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
3 ms
shield-access.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shield-access.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shield-access.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shield-access.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shield-access.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shield-access.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shield Access. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: