Tools & Wizards About Us
shield-uk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

shield-uk.com

Shield Uk | Solar & Safety Window Films | Blast Mitigation Film London

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

shield-uk.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Shield Uk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shield-uk.com

Shield offer Solar & Safety Window Films, Manifestation Graphics, Bomb Blast Mitigation Window Film to all business in and around London.

Visit shield-uk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shield-uk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shield-uk.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.643

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shield-uk.com

1291 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

231 ms

Unboxed_grey.css

155 ms

layerslider.css

233 ms

css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Shield-uk.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Shield-uk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 174.3 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shield-uk.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 986.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 73.2 kB

  • Original 92.7 kB
  • After minification 90.0 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 35.0 kB

  • Original 986.0 kB
  • After minification 950.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shield Uk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 328.0 kB
  • After minification 328.0 kB
  • After compression 287.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 105.8 kB
  • After minification 105.6 kB
  • After compression 80.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shield-uk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (72%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shield Uk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.shield-uk.com

www.shield-uk.com

1291 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

231 ms

Unboxed_grey.css

Unboxed_grey.css

155 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

233 ms

css

css

21 ms

styles.css

styles.css

156 ms

settings.css

settings.css

234 ms

style.css

style.css

235 ms

style.css

style.css

235 ms

base.css

base.css

384 ms

layout.css

layout.css

470 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

464 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

389 ms

jquery.ui.all.css

jquery.ui.all.css

312 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

390 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.css

jplayer.blue.monday.css

461 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

544 ms

css

css

39 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

620 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

514 ms

PrettyFileList.js

PrettyFileList.js

539 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

618 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

650 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

542 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

643 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

649 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

236 ms

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

263 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

263 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

324 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

336 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

341 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

340 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

343 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

421 ms

menu.js

menu.js

393 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

413 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

418 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

419 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

420 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

471 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

489 ms

shield-logo.png

shield-logo.png

283 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

590 ms

shield-slide2-1.jpg

shield-slide2-1.jpg

515 ms

shield-1.jpg

shield-1.jpg

596 ms

arrow-1.png

arrow-1.png

256 ms

home_energy_box_3.jpg

home_energy_box_3.jpg

275 ms

privacy-glass-1.png

privacy-glass-1.png

412 ms

bomb.jpg

bomb.jpg

431 ms

bg2-2.jpg

bg2-2.jpg

435 ms

shield-logo-bw.png

shield-logo-bw.png

496 ms

box_shadow.png

box_shadow.png

486 ms

7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8cLx1nejpA.woff

7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8cLx1nejpA.woff

82 ms

7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8SX21nejpA.woff

7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8SX21nejpA.woff

160 ms

mfn-icons.woff

mfn-icons.woff

563 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

376 ms

box_shadow_button.png

box_shadow_button.png

372 ms

Accessibility Review

shield-uk.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shield-uk.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

shield-uk.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shield-uk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shield-uk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shield-uk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shield Uk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: