2.1 sec in total
43 ms
1.3 sec
709 ms
Visit shield.eu now to see the best up-to-date SHIELD content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shield.eu
Visit shield.euWe analyzed Shield.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
shield.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.1 s
63/100
10%
43 ms
346 ms
96 ms
89 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Shield.eu, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Shield.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 95.1 kB (15%)
632.2 kB
537.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Shield.eu main page is 632.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 270.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SHIELD images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 386 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shield.eu has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (74%)
35
9
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SHIELD. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shield.eu
43 ms
www.shield.eu
346 ms
style.min.css
96 ms
styles.css
89 ms
style.css
103 ms
style.css
48 ms
fontawesome.min.css
31 ms
js_composer.min.css
62 ms
breeze-prefetch-links.min.js
100 ms
jquery.min.js
149 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
144 ms
email-decode.min.js
98 ms
css
309 ms
rs6.css
60 ms
hooks.min.js
61 ms
i18n.min.js
60 ms
index.js
60 ms
index.js
60 ms
rbtools.min.js
312 ms
rs6.min.js
309 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
313 ms
skrollr.min.js
307 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
311 ms
masonry.min.js
310 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
311 ms
jquery.clb-slider.min.js
313 ms
jquery.mega-menu.min.js
312 ms
jquery.tilt.min.js
316 ms
aos.min.js
313 ms
typed.min.js
313 ms
main.min.js
314 ms
LOGO_SHIELD_WHITE_NEW.png
141 ms
LOGO_SHIELD.png
139 ms
oh__demo3__1-min.jpg
260 ms
oh__demo3__14-min.png
138 ms
oh__demo3__15-min.png
138 ms
oh__demo3__16-min.png
141 ms
oh__demo3__17-min.png
142 ms
shield.eu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shield.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
shield.eu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shield.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shield.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shield.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SHIELD. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: