Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

shieldarmoring.com

Top Armored Cars Company in India, Armored Vehicle Manufacturers Company in India

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

830 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

391 ms

shieldarmoring.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shieldarmoring.com homepage info - get ready to check Shieldarmoring best content right away, or after learning these important things about shieldarmoring.com

Shieldarmoring one of the top most armored vehicle and Cars Manufacturers Company In India. also specialize in design as well as production of a wide range of armored vehicles.

Visit shieldarmoring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shieldarmoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 830 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shieldarmoring.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,650 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shieldarmoring.com

830 ms

bootstrap.css

726 ms

revolution-slider.css

490 ms

owl.css

485 ms

style.css

762 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Shieldarmoring.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Shieldarmoring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 309.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Shieldarmoring.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 96.9 kB

  • Original 115.5 kB
  • After minification 82.5 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.0 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shieldarmoring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 395.2 kB
  • After minification 395.2 kB
  • After compression 328.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 116.8 kB

  • Original 242.5 kB
  • After minification 242.5 kB
  • After compression 125.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shieldarmoring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.8 kB or 48% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (44%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shieldarmoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

shieldarmoring.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shieldarmoring.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shieldarmoring.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shieldarmoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Shieldarmoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shieldarmoring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: