2.1 sec in total
139 ms
1.7 sec
258 ms
Visit shieldonline.com now to see the best up-to-date Shield Online content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shieldonline.com
Established in 1977 they have been developing new innovative designs for 40 years. As a result of which Shield are known throughout its sector as a brand that professionals can trust
Visit shieldonline.comWe analyzed Shieldonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
shieldonline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.852
4/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
139 ms
81 ms
505 ms
64 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Shieldonline.com, 19% (11 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (604 ms) belongs to the original domain Shieldonline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 70.7 kB (7%)
1.0 MB
929.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Shieldonline.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 872.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shield Online images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 64 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shieldonline.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (42%)
52
30
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shield Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shieldonline.com
139 ms
shieldonline.com
81 ms
www.shieldonline.com
505 ms
theme-92370790-549b-013c-c8a4-5ee641beca66.css
64 ms
css
64 ms
modernizr-custom.js
77 ms
js.cookie.min.js
50 ms
google_analytics4-9a468da7c21d2e9e41cd445d567f3f3a5a9b6759.js
61 ms
loader.js
141 ms
index.js
81 ms
jquery-3.2.1.min.js
50 ms
bcLightbox.js
208 ms
moreNav.js
159 ms
smoothScroll.js
238 ms
blackFridayCountdown.js
249 ms
698547c728.js
53 ms
bcLightbox.css
281 ms
moreNav.css
181 ms
theme-bundle.js
77 ms
csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js
87 ms
visitor_stencil.js
55 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
iz6pe1hbmj
447 ms
ecommerce.js
14 ms
collect
15 ms
nobot
40 ms
698547c728.css
10 ms
shield-logo_1508849973__53113.original.jpg
22 ms
partofdfsales.png
15 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
9 ms
loading.svg
42 ms
hp-clothing3.jpg
271 ms
hp-dust-sale.jpg
269 ms
hp-gloves.jpg
270 ms
hp-ladiesworkwear.jpg
302 ms
hp-eye.jpg
269 ms
hp-mask.jpg
304 ms
shield-products.jpg
303 ms
shieldsub.png
302 ms
whybuydelivery.png
304 ms
whybuysupport.png
400 ms
whybuysecure.png
381 ms
whybuyhappy.png
362 ms
testimonialfacenew1.jpg
339 ms
testimonialfacenew2.jpg
548 ms
testimonialfacenew3.jpg
426 ms
acceptedcardsnew.png
401 ms
sale-star.png
604 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff
48 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
28 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
48 ms
cookie-notification
204 ms
index.php
274 ms
clarity.js
18 ms
trouser__80716.1508948642.png
18 ms
bib__29965.1508946853.png
15 ms
SuperSuitLarge__07255.1509007564.png
16 ms
c.gif
8 ms
shieldonline.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shieldonline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
shieldonline.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shieldonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shieldonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shieldonline.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shield Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: