Tools & Wizards About Us
shieldpay.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

shieldpay.com

Shieldpay | Simplify your complex transactions

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

532 ms

shieldpay.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shieldpay.com homepage info - get ready to check Shieldpay best content right away, or after learning these important things about shieldpay.com

Shieldpay provides simple and transparent payment solutions across the legal, financial and professional services industries.

Visit shieldpay.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shieldpay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shieldpay.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shieldpay.com

104 ms

auto-blocking.js

254 ms

pwr-burger.min.css

54 ms

scroll-shadow.min.css

71 ms

pwr-sec-mockup.min.css

269 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Shieldpay.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Secure.tray0bury.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (411 ms) belongs to the original domain Shieldpay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 438.1 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

749.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shieldpay.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 612.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 428.3 kB

  • Original 489.7 kB
  • After minification 482.6 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 428.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 612.2 kB
  • After minification 612.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shieldpay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 76.8 kB
  • After compression 68.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 9.1 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shieldpay.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (63%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shieldpay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.shieldpay.com

www.shieldpay.com

104 ms

auto-blocking.js

auto-blocking.js

254 ms

pwr-burger.min.css

pwr-burger.min.css

54 ms

scroll-shadow.min.css

scroll-shadow.min.css

71 ms

pwr-sec-mockup.min.css

pwr-sec-mockup.min.css

269 ms

pwr-sec-clients.min.css

pwr-sec-clients.min.css

76 ms

_swiper-bundle.min.css

_swiper-bundle.min.css

74 ms

js

js

77 ms

193769.js

193769.js

65 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

19 ms

780950.js

780950.js

78 ms

current.js

current.js

107 ms

embed.js

embed.js

41 ms

pwr.min.js

pwr.min.js

119 ms

child.min.js

child.min.js

110 ms

project.js

project.js

107 ms

pwr-burger.min.js

pwr-burger.min.js

130 ms

scroll-shadow.min.js

scroll-shadow.min.js

151 ms

project.js

project.js

144 ms

advanced-mm.min.js

advanced-mm.min.js

159 ms

_swiper-bundle.min.js

_swiper-bundle.min.js

167 ms

pwr-swiper.min.js

pwr-swiper.min.js

175 ms

Isotope.min.js

Isotope.min.js

411 ms

fitrows.min.js

fitrows.min.js

192 ms

Packery.min.js

Packery.min.js

206 ms

pwr-masonry.min.js

pwr-masonry.min.js

219 ms

2906189.js

2906189.js

368 ms

index.js

index.js

261 ms

897f59b6-dac1-40b7-bc28-b5f192421313.png

897f59b6-dac1-40b7-bc28-b5f192421313.png

268 ms

shieldpay-logo-web-dark.svg

shieldpay-logo-web-dark.svg

128 ms

home-hero-background.png

home-hero-background.png

184 ms

home-hero.svg

home-hero.svg

135 ms

Addleshar-logo-white.svg

Addleshar-logo-white.svg

131 ms

bdb-pitmans--logo-white.svg

bdb-pitmans--logo-white.svg

128 ms

white-and-case-logo-white.svg

white-and-case-logo-white.svg

256 ms

milberg-logo-white.svg

milberg-logo-white.svg

261 ms

Osborne-logo-white.svg

Osborne-logo-white.svg

254 ms

POGUST-logo-white.svg

POGUST-logo-white.svg

257 ms

OAKNORTH-logo-white.svg

OAKNORTH-logo-white.svg

251 ms

Avamore-logo-white.svg

Avamore-logo-white.svg

266 ms

thompsons-logo-white.svg

thompsons-logo-white.svg

263 ms

pogust-goodhead-case-study-image.svg

pogust-goodhead-case-study-image.svg

396 ms

UK-top-law-firm-case-study-image.svg

UK-top-law-firm-case-study-image.svg

273 ms

Dark%20blue%20background%20radia.svg

Dark%20blue%20background%20radia.svg

146 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

236 ms

500.woff

500.woff

234 ms

600.woff

600.woff

233 ms

700.woff

700.woff

234 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

235 ms

500.woff

500.woff

233 ms

600.woff

600.woff

236 ms

700.woff

700.woff

237 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

197 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

83 ms

fb.js

fb.js

77 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

99 ms

banner.js

banner.js

116 ms

2906189.js

2906189.js

148 ms

Accessibility Review

shieldpay.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shieldpay.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shieldpay.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shieldpay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shieldpay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shieldpay.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shieldpay. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: