Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

shieldsquare.com

Comprehensive Bot Management | Radware

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

360 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

shieldsquare.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shieldsquare.com homepage info - get ready to check Shieldsquare best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about shieldsquare.com

Radware Bot Manager provides comprehensive protection of web applications, mobile apps and APIs from automated threats like bots.

Visit shieldsquare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shieldsquare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shieldsquare.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value35,440 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value67.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shieldsquare.com

360 ms

css

34 ms

css

59 ms

css

58 ms

dd.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Shieldsquare.com, 20% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to System.picreel.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) belongs to the original domain Shieldsquare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (58%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Shieldsquare.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 179.8 kB

  • Original 213.3 kB
  • After minification 204.0 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 857.4 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 868.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shieldsquare needs image optimization as it can save up to 857.4 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 269.3 kB

  • Original 432.7 kB
  • After minification 416.8 kB
  • After compression 163.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 216.8 kB

  • Original 263.5 kB
  • After minification 259.6 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shieldsquare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (54%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shieldsquare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

shieldsquare.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

shieldsquare.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shieldsquare.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shieldsquare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shieldsquare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shieldsquare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: