1.4 sec in total
207 ms
1 sec
146 ms
Welcome to shineteck.com homepage info - get ready to check Shineteck best content right away, or after learning these important things about shineteck.com
Visit shineteck.comWe analyzed Shineteck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
shineteck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.377
28/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
207 ms
124 ms
226 ms
117 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Shineteck.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (530 ms) belongs to the original domain Shineteck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 982.3 kB (52%)
1.9 MB
892.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Shineteck.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 744.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shineteck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 533.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 533.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 388.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shineteck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 388.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (63%)
67
25
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shineteck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shineteck.com
207 ms
k2.css
124 ms
bootstrap.min.css
226 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
117 ms
font-awesome.css
120 ms
css
27 ms
mobile-menu.css
108 ms
uikit.almost-flat.css
214 ms
template.css
184 ms
preset1.css
199 ms
sp_countdown.css
159 ms
strips.css
156 ms
mod_news_show_sp2.css
202 ms
lists.css
201 ms
mosaic.css
250 ms
settings.css
236 ms
captions.css
234 ms
mootools-core.js
348 ms
jquery.min.js
290 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
261 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
290 ms
core.js
285 ms
k288e4.js
290 ms
jquery-noconflict1.js
296 ms
bootstrap.min.js
380 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
326 ms
helix.core.js
332 ms
menu.js
327 ms
template.js
333 ms
uikit.min.js
400 ms
mootools-mobile.js
400 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
405 ms
roksprocket.js
406 ms
moofx.js
407 ms
roksprocket.request.js
411 ms
strips.js
412 ms
strips-speeds.js
411 ms
mootools-more.js
530 ms
nssp2.js
316 ms
lists.js
317 ms
lists1.js
322 ms
mosaic.js
322 ms
mosaic1.js
291 ms
fitvids.js
291 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
284 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
316 ms
logo.png
95 ms
bg-2.jpg
96 ms
businessman.png
175 ms
bg-conference.jpg
109 ms
shower-girl.png
172 ms
keynotes.jpg
93 ms
strategies.jpg
113 ms
workshop.jpg
109 ms
news-icon.jpg
109 ms
dicelogo.gif
133 ms
careerbuilderlogo.gif
134 ms
microsoft.png
146 ms
dell.png
156 ms
oracle.png
202 ms
lt.png
172 ms
sun.png
202 ms
ibm.png
201 ms
symantec.jpg
211 ms
everify.jpg
208 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
65 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
66 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
66 ms
fontawesome-webfontf77b.woff
228 ms
timer.png
131 ms
loader.gif
154 ms
large_left.png
43 ms
large_right.png
44 ms
shineteck.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shineteck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
shineteck.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shineteck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shineteck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shineteck.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shineteck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: