Tools & Wizards About Us
shipccl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

shipccl.com

CAICOS CARIBBEAN LINES

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

116 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

444 ms

shipccl.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shipccl.com homepage info - get ready to check Shipccl best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about shipccl.com

Visit shipccl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shipccl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shipccl.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shipccl.com

116 ms

www.shipccl.com

1618 ms

style.min.css

110 ms

styles.css

164 ms

font-awesome.min.css

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Shipccl.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Shipccl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 687.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

10.1 MB

After Optimization

9.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shipccl.com main page is 10.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 133.9 kB

  • Original 154.5 kB
  • After minification 152.1 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 548.0 kB

  • Original 9.4 MB
  • After minification 8.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shipccl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 439.4 kB
  • After minification 439.4 kB
  • After compression 437.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 171.7 kB
  • After minification 171.7 kB
  • After compression 167.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shipccl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (76%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shipccl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shipccl.com

shipccl.com

116 ms

www.shipccl.com

www.shipccl.com

1618 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

110 ms

styles.css

styles.css

164 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

167 ms

style.css

style.css

170 ms

blog-layouts-module.css

blog-layouts-module.css

175 ms

css

css

36 ms

jet-blocks.css

jet-blocks.css

184 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

226 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

217 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

224 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

237 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

246 ms

jet-blog.css

jet-blog.css

195 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

232 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

236 ms

css

css

21 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

300 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

246 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

247 ms

slider-pro.min.css

slider-pro.min.css

247 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

286 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

294 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

292 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

476 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

477 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

478 ms

index.js

index.js

479 ms

index.js

index.js

479 ms

responsive-menu.js

responsive-menu.js

479 ms

jquery.ui.totop.min.js

jquery.ui.totop.min.js

479 ms

theme-script.js

theme-script.js

480 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

481 ms

index.js

index.js

481 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

481 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

482 ms

jquery.sliderPro.min.js

jquery.sliderPro.min.js

483 ms

jquery.jsticky.min.js

jquery.jsticky.min.js

482 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

482 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

426 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

376 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

370 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

365 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

352 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

409 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

376 ms

jet-blocks.min.js

jet-blocks.min.js

370 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

356 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

357 ms

jet-blog.min.js

jet-blog.min.js

339 ms

ccl-logo.png

ccl-logo.png

277 ms

image-001-scaled.jpg

image-001-scaled.jpg

560 ms

image-000.jpg

image-000.jpg

556 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

593 ms

Home-Inspection-1024x567.png

Home-Inspection-1024x567.png

562 ms

image-002-1024x672.jpg

image-002-1024x672.jpg

348 ms

image-003-1024x683.jpg

image-003-1024x683.jpg

460 ms

services-3.jpg

services-3.jpg

516 ms

services-5.1.jpg

services-5.1.jpg

522 ms

services-4.jpg

services-4.jpg

487 ms

Home-Inspection-2-e1650431845972-768x501.png

Home-Inspection-2-e1650431845972-768x501.png

550 ms

ocean-1.png

ocean-1.png

159 ms

font

font

66 ms

font

font

67 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

496 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

496 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

509 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

60 ms

ocean-1.png

ocean-1.png

538 ms

anchor

anchor

37 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

12 ms

CciQOPzW_-qTgdgmkmMz-SpBjJzB-CBeKtl8roXNuaw.js

CciQOPzW_-qTgdgmkmMz-SpBjJzB-CBeKtl8roXNuaw.js

39 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

71 ms

Accessibility Review

shipccl.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shipccl.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

shipccl.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shipccl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shipccl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shipccl.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shipccl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: