Tools & Wizards About Us
shipping-to.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

shipping-to.com

International Shipping Services - Compare Companies & quotes by Shipping-To.com

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

518 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

shipping-to.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Shipping To content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shipping-to.com

Compare International Cargo Shipping Companies & Rates by posting one request and getting manny offers. Free. We offer Air, Ocean, Road service. Door to door, door to port, port to port. By shipping-t...

Visit shipping-to.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shipping-to.com page load time and found that the first response time was 518 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shipping-to.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shipping-to.com

518 ms

script.js

183 ms

overlib.js

191 ms

default.css

184 ms

show_ads.js

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Shipping-to.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 19% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (518 ms) belongs to the original domain Shipping-to.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.4 kB (45%)

Content Size

92.0 kB

After Optimization

50.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Shipping-to.com main page is 92.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 47.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 31.1 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.2 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shipping To images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 47.7 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (39%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shipping To. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shipping-to.com

shipping-to.com

518 ms

script.js

script.js

183 ms

overlib.js

overlib.js

191 ms

default.css

default.css

184 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

85 ms

ga.js

ga.js

112 ms

ca-pub-7768488198534508.js

ca-pub-7768488198534508.js

58 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

43 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

168 ms

top-back.gif

top-back.gif

197 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

38 ms

ads

ads

260 ms

osd.js

osd.js

18 ms

ads

ads

172 ms

ads

ads

323 ms

ads

ads

351 ms

abg.js

abg.js

89 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

41 ms

favicon

favicon

98 ms

s

s

45 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

85 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

73 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

70 ms

favicon

favicon

92 ms

favicon

favicon

48 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

26 ms

Accessibility Review

shipping-to.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

shipping-to.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

shipping-to.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shipping-to.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shipping-to.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

shipping-to.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shipping To. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: