1.7 sec in total
305 ms
1.3 sec
71 ms
Click here to check amazing Shipping content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shipping.fo
shipping.fo works with the shipping industry. Aspects that we cover - crew management, accounting, ISO/ISM/ISPS certification, and audits.
Visit shipping.foWe analyzed Shipping.fo page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
shipping.fo performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
305 ms
56 ms
62 ms
59 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Shipping.fo, 40% (23 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (866 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 621.0 kB (22%)
2.8 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Shipping.fo main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 602.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 602.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shipping images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 56 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shipping.fo has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (33%)
36
24
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shipping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shipping.fo
305 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
56 ms
minified.js
62 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
59 ms
polyfill.min.js
51 ms
mobile-app-invite-banner.css
110 ms
mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js
108 ms
f6a12c_78103b9c857846f19530b56597d6a16e~mv2.png
408 ms
Shipping-bumerki-pp%20(002)_edited.png
354 ms
Wallpaper%20new%202.jpg
326 ms
f6a12c_8be110b35f2c49f593fc2df3118617b8~mv2.png
329 ms
f6a12c_7ba73054ea5d463bbe907fc3d266fdc8~mv2.png
268 ms
f6a12c_4e857cebdff14888961d44e1f248d5dd~mv2.jpg
311 ms
f6a12c_2ccf1e728a9145ecbf8b365c7bea3298~mv2_d_4240_2832_s_4_2.jpg
591 ms
f6a12c_6085527149384d438b4521e83981f665~mv2.jpg
559 ms
f6a12c_3988967c64b24ccea7a086bb8d48e5e6~mv2.jpg
676 ms
f6a12c_424fa742789e4b5dbb08c1ff65cda44d~mv2.jpg
590 ms
f6a12c_adc5cc3420094595ad6c52ccec99b551~mv2.jpg
866 ms
f6a12c_68bc3e275cc646df943e08f749e8cf5f~mv2.jpg
611 ms
f6a12c_c1dc89f5ca994a1988e90d4442ef74ee~mv2.jpg
788 ms
f6a12c_5e528a22b992437f8d9e66b28f19dba1~mv2.jpg
778 ms
4281e8634ade4a9a96bf526675683092.jpg
592 ms
87058d97168244cd9a6e9780580d8eb3.jpg
690 ms
bundle.min.js
163 ms
thunderbolt-commons.67e14581.bundle.min.js
105 ms
main.5ab8d530.bundle.min.js
105 ms
lodash.min.js
109 ms
react.production.min.js
105 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
110 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
112 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
112 ms
f6a12c_6b2204a67d3447cdba9ff9c7b6833c65~mv2_d_2048_1366_s_2.jpg
733 ms
f6a12c_3988967c64b24ccea7a086bb8d48e5e6~mv2.jpg
726 ms
aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
26 ms
9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
25 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
26 ms
p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff
23 ms
h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
25 ms
155 ms
144 ms
145 ms
149 ms
145 ms
146 ms
183 ms
184 ms
181 ms
179 ms
178 ms
184 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
19 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
6 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
shipping.fo accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
shipping.fo best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
shipping.fo SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shipping.fo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shipping.fo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shipping.fo
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shipping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: