3.6 sec in total
785 ms
2.5 sec
305 ms
Visit shippybag.com now to see the best up-to-date Shippybag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shippybag.com
A partir de 1 €TTC par kg, vous pouvez expédier toutes vos affaires dans le monde entier. Grâce à nos partenaires, nous vous proposons le meilleur service.
Visit shippybag.comWe analyzed Shippybag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 785 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
shippybag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
785 ms
10 ms
31 ms
35 ms
637 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Shippybag.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (785 ms) belongs to the original domain Shippybag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 313.7 kB (10%)
3.1 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Shippybag.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 243.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shippybag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shippybag.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (67%)
36
12
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shippybag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shippybag.com
785 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
jquery-ui.css
31 ms
jquery-ui.js
35 ms
style.css
637 ms
front_end_style.css
126 ms
dashicons.min.css
125 ms
desktop_style.css
129 ms
styles.css
128 ms
css
74 ms
css
75 ms
style.css
115 ms
shortcodes.css
188 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
185 ms
jquery.js
208 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
194 ms
jquery.form.min.js
193 ms
scripts.js
248 ms
comment-reply.min.js
251 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
273 ms
waypoints.min.js
265 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
279 ms
custom.js
307 ms
smoothscroll.js
309 ms
wp-embed.min.js
327 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
style.css
80 ms
logo.png
200 ms
Screen-Shot-2014-11-23-at-14.03.16.png
343 ms
first-slide.jpg
352 ms
sec-slide.jpg
353 ms
third-slide.jpg
410 ms
first-slide1.jpg
411 ms
fifth-slide.jpg
469 ms
sixth-slide.jpg
351 ms
f_logo.png
409 ms
analytics.js
82 ms
ETmodules_v2.ttf
196 ms
collect
61 ms
shippybag.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shippybag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
shippybag.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shippybag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Shippybag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shippybag.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shippybag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: