Tools & Wizards About Us
shiptron.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

shiptron.com

SHIPTRON Marine Communication Specialists - extends your communications

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

573 ms

shiptron.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shiptron.com homepage info - get ready to check SHIPTRON best content right away, or after learning these important things about shiptron.com

SHIPTRON Marine Communication Specialists - reliable dedicated partner - communication solutions - platform, wind farm, fishing, offshore and onshore.

Visit shiptron.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shiptron.com page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shiptron.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.778

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shiptron.com

256 ms

shiptron.com

515 ms

h9z48.css

340 ms

h9z48.css

334 ms

h9z48.css

324 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Shiptron.com, 25% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Shiptron.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 275.7 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shiptron.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 273.3 kB

  • Original 324.0 kB
  • After minification 323.9 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 273.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 563 B

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SHIPTRON images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 363.9 kB
  • After minification 363.9 kB
  • After compression 362.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 316 B

  • Original 56.9 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB
  • After compression 56.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shiptron.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (80%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SHIPTRON. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shiptron.com

shiptron.com

256 ms

shiptron.com

shiptron.com

515 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

340 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

334 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

324 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

319 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

326 ms

h9z49.js

h9z49.js

438 ms

h9z49.js

h9z49.js

685 ms

h9z49.js

h9z49.js

609 ms

h9z49.js

h9z49.js

625 ms

h9z49.js

h9z49.js

624 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

289 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

297 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

32 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

590 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

728 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

864 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1078 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

886 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

902 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

940 ms

common.js

common.js

1041 ms

wp_footer.js

wp_footer.js

1158 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

1255 ms

jquery-baldrick.min.js

jquery-baldrick.min.js

1199 ms

parsley.min.js

parsley.min.js

1338 ms

en.js

en.js

1337 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1370 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1453 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1637 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

1554 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

1802 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1632 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

1380 ms

caldera-forms-front.min.js

caldera-forms-front.min.js

1394 ms

jquery.exitintent.js

jquery.exitintent.js

1692 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1827 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

149 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

1186 ms

subscribe-loader.gif

subscribe-loader.gif

1260 ms

nKKZ-Go6G5tXcoaR.woff

nKKZ-Go6G5tXcoaR.woff

163 ms

nKKZ-Go6G5tXcoaS.ttf

nKKZ-Go6G5tXcoaS.ttf

198 ms

font

font

301 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5mOCWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5mOCWg.ttf

262 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-OSWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-OSWj.woff

301 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-OSWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-OSWg.ttf

276 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5aOiWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5aOiWj.woff

309 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5aOiWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5aOiWg.ttf

221 ms

nKKX-Go6G5tXcr72GwY.woff

nKKX-Go6G5tXcr72GwY.woff

308 ms

nKKX-Go6G5tXcr72GwU.ttf

nKKX-Go6G5tXcr72GwU.ttf

295 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPyWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPyWj.woff

373 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPyWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPyWg.ttf

329 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPiWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPiWj.woff

334 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPiWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPiWg.ttf

334 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4yPSWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4yPSWj.woff

378 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4yPSWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4yPSWg.ttf

340 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4WPCWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4WPCWj.woff

391 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4WPCWg.ttf

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4WPCWg.ttf

367 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

1390 ms

et-divi-dynamic-50156-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-50156-late.css

1684 ms

js

js

108 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

115 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

372 ms

foto-header-splitscreenv2.jpg

foto-header-splitscreenv2.jpg

656 ms

header-homev3.jpg

header-homev3.jpg

648 ms

slidermarifoon.jpg

slidermarifoon.jpg

640 ms

Aurelia-1.jpg

Aurelia-1.jpg

659 ms

h9z48.css

h9z48.css

381 ms

Accessibility Review

shiptron.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shiptron.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

shiptron.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shiptron.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shiptron.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shiptron.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SHIPTRON. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: