Access shirc.org. SHIRC

Report Summary

About Website

Visit shirc.org now to see the best up-to-date SHIRC content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shirc.org

Speech & Hearing Institute and Research Centre, SHIRC works for the development of speech and hearing impared children through Protection, Child Education, Healthcare, Counselling, Donation, Sponsorsh...

Visit shirc.org

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

shirc.org

242 ms

js

70 ms

grid.css

64 ms

style.css

124 ms

colorScheme-8.css

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Shirc.org, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (359 ms) belongs to the original domain Shirc.org.

Content Size

721.9 kB

After Optimization

605.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Shirc.org main page is 721.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 548.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

Original 34.3 kB
After minification 26.8 kB
After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 40.1 kB

Original 548.6 kB
After minification 508.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SHIRC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

Original 111.1 kB
After minification 110.9 kB
After compression 78.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

Original 27.8 kB
After minification 25.6 kB
After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shirc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SHIRC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shirc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shirc.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

shirc.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SHIRC. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

SHIRC

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)