3.9 sec in total
793 ms
2.3 sec
816 ms
Visit shmerida.com now to see the best up-to-date Shmerida content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shmerida.com
Software House Mérida, Yucatán, México, is organized around a new nearshoring software development concept. Programming talent is core to our business and to our clients' success. We hire for you and ...
Visit shmerida.comWe analyzed Shmerida.com page load time and found that the first response time was 793 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
shmerida.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value23.9 s
0/100
25%
Value16.8 s
0/100
10%
Value2,640 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.9 s
1/100
10%
793 ms
100 ms
84 ms
150 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Shmerida.com, 71% (57 requests) were made to Shmerida.mx and 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (793 ms) belongs to the original domain Shmerida.com.
Page size can be reduced by 193.1 kB (6%)
3.5 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Shmerida.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.2 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shmerida images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shmerida.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (65%)
74
26
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shmerida. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shmerida.com
793 ms
css
100 ms
bootstrap.min.css
84 ms
all.css
150 ms
animate.min.css
99 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
111 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
188 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
193 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
208 ms
theme.css
129 ms
theme-elements.css
219 ms
theme-blog.css
134 ms
theme-shop.css
212 ms
settings.css
143 ms
layers.css
157 ms
navigation.css
170 ms
component.css
182 ms
default.css
196 ms
w3.css
140 ms
custom.css
328 ms
modernizr.min.js
276 ms
api.js
103 ms
jquery.min.js
208 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
354 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
228 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
291 ms
common.min.js
229 ms
jquery.validation.min.js
237 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js
353 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
247 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
257 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
267 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
288 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
424 ms
vide.min.js
301 ms
bootstrap.min.js
92 ms
theme.js
303 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
321 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
531 ms
theme.init.js
348 ms
examples.portfolio.js
345 ms
js
117 ms
ckeditor.js
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
recaptcha__en.js
174 ms
YvMV1-BHcYg
409 ms
logo-default-slim-dark-small.png
166 ms
slider-1.jpg
271 ms
slider-3.jpg
166 ms
slide-20.jpg
173 ms
birkman.jpg
111 ms
quality.png
168 ms
challenging.png
167 ms
relationship.png
168 ms
logo-1.png
271 ms
logo-2.png
170 ms
logo-3.png
272 ms
logo-4.png
171 ms
logo-5.png
274 ms
logo-6.png
273 ms
logo-7.png
274 ms
logo-8.png
345 ms
logo-9.png
346 ms
logo-10.png
346 ms
logo-11.png
273 ms
logo-12.png
348 ms
nom035_seal.png
360 ms
logo-footer-sh2.png
346 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
54 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
153 ms
revicons.woff
298 ms
www-player.css
16 ms
www-embed-player.js
25 ms
base.js
67 ms
ad_status.js
281 ms
Hg8RJ6IYDEt2XfeS9TTatHSj5NgA1bkUUg8jx44YVvw.js
197 ms
embed.js
126 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
166 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
167 ms
id
162 ms
shmerida.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shmerida.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
shmerida.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shmerida.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shmerida.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shmerida.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shmerida. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: