2.7 sec in total
182 ms
1.7 sec
800 ms
Click here to check amazing Shmerida content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shmerida.mx
Software House Mérida, Yucatán, México, is organized around a new nearshoring software development concept. Programming talent is core to our business and to our clients' success. We hire for you and ...
Visit shmerida.mxWe analyzed Shmerida.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
shmerida.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value27.8 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value2,270 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.8 s
1/100
10%
182 ms
90 ms
70 ms
139 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Shmerida.mx, 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) belongs to the original domain Shmerida.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 191.7 kB (5%)
3.5 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Shmerida.mx main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.7 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shmerida images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shmerida.mx has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (65%)
75
26
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shmerida. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shmerida.mx
182 ms
css
90 ms
bootstrap.min.css
70 ms
all.css
139 ms
animate.min.css
90 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
100 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
180 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
188 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
124 ms
theme.css
114 ms
theme-elements.css
214 ms
theme-blog.css
111 ms
theme-shop.css
204 ms
settings.css
199 ms
layers.css
139 ms
navigation.css
229 ms
component.css
188 ms
default.css
272 ms
w3.css
158 ms
custom.css
202 ms
modernizr.min.js
225 ms
ckeditor.js
89 ms
api.js
84 ms
email-decode.min.js
22 ms
jquery.min.js
223 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
220 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
224 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
359 ms
common.min.js
363 ms
jquery.validation.min.js
359 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js
233 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
234 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
245 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
363 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
294 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
356 ms
vide.min.js
348 ms
bootstrap.min.js
55 ms
theme.js
357 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
359 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
360 ms
theme.init.js
423 ms
examples.portfolio.js
422 ms
js
101 ms
font-awesome.min.css
43 ms
recaptcha__en.js
201 ms
YvMV1-BHcYg
309 ms
logo-default-slim-dark-small.png
194 ms
slider-1.jpg
297 ms
slider-3.jpg
191 ms
slide-20.jpg
190 ms
birkman.jpg
197 ms
quality.png
293 ms
challenging.png
193 ms
relationship.png
359 ms
logo-1.png
296 ms
logo-2.png
193 ms
logo-3.png
296 ms
logo-4.png
300 ms
logo-5.png
407 ms
logo-6.png
407 ms
logo-7.png
406 ms
logo-8.png
407 ms
logo-9.png
406 ms
logo-10.png
437 ms
logo-11.png
867 ms
logo-12.png
865 ms
nom035_seal.png
865 ms
logo-footer-sh2.png
863 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
115 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
121 ms
www-player.css
61 ms
www-embed-player.js
110 ms
base.js
145 ms
revicons.woff
473 ms
ad_status.js
323 ms
Hg8RJ6IYDEt2XfeS9TTatHSj5NgA1bkUUg8jx44YVvw.js
235 ms
embed.js
168 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
142 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
142 ms
id
134 ms
shmerida.mx accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shmerida.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
shmerida.mx SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shmerida.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shmerida.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shmerida.mx
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shmerida. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: