6.6 sec in total
253 ms
6.1 sec
223 ms
Click here to check amazing Shock Absorber content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shockabsorber.co.uk
info@shockabsorber.co.uk
Visit shockabsorber.co.ukWe analyzed Shockabsorber.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
shockabsorber.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value22.3 s
0/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value4,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.12
84/100
15%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
253 ms
2874 ms
173 ms
258 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Shockabsorber.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Shockabsorber.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 834.6 kB (32%)
2.6 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Shockabsorber.co.uk main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shock Absorber images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 571.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 571.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 177.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shockabsorber.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 177.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (75%)
75
19
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shock Absorber. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shockabsorber.co.uk
253 ms
www.shockabsorber.co.uk
2874 ms
style.css
173 ms
modernizr.js
258 ms
acf-global.css
279 ms
color-picker.min.css
178 ms
select2.css
178 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.css
247 ms
acf-input.css
422 ms
acf-pro-input.css
357 ms
input.css
354 ms
imgareaselect.css
427 ms
styles.css
435 ms
style.css
428 ms
css
27 ms
owl.carousel.css
524 ms
zoombox.css
526 ms
main.css
668 ms
jquery.min.js
844 ms
core.min.js
599 ms
widget.min.js
600 ms
mouse.min.js
699 ms
sortable.min.js
779 ms
resizable.min.js
861 ms
datepicker.min.js
863 ms
draggable.min.js
918 ms
slider.min.js
867 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
949 ms
iris.min.js
1108 ms
color-picker.min.js
1029 ms
select2.min.js
1191 ms
acf-input.min.js
1214 ms
acf-pro-input.min.js
1182 ms
jquery.imgareaselect.min.js
1117 ms
input.js
1205 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1302 ms
scripts.js
1223 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1376 ms
js
46 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1381 ms
zoombox.js
1313 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1319 ms
jquery.history.js
1375 ms
moment-with-locales.min.js
1551 ms
easyzoom.js
1351 ms
common.js
1354 ms
desktop.js
1299 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1387 ms
header_search.png
482 ms
header_social.png
612 ms
header_logo.png
729 ms
header_menu_map.png
612 ms
header_switcher.png
676 ms
main_bg.png
699 ms
S015F-lead-1290x484.jpg
1148 ms
RunBra-Homepage-1290x484.jpg
1149 ms
ultimategymbra_021-1290x484.jpg
1242 ms
visuel_hp_patchwork_instagram_ok-1290x484.jpg
1548 ms
home_sport.jpg
1345 ms
home_choices.png
1134 ms
home_bounce.png
1706 ms
news_9.png
1803 ms
actu_source.png
1315 ms
actu_twitter.png
1412 ms
2548_1456074908-286x183.jpg
1659 ms
footer_conception.png
1598 ms
footer_fact.png
1588 ms
footer_social.png
1717 ms
cookie_close.png
1760 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
28 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
42 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
55 ms
home_slider_arrows.png
1163 ms
ga.js
66 ms
sdk.js
25 ms
widgets.js
24 ms
38 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
xd_arbiter.php
14 ms
xd_arbiter.php
21 ms
collect
47 ms
shockabsorber.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shockabsorber.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
shockabsorber.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shockabsorber.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shockabsorber.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shockabsorber.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shock Absorber. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: