5.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.1 sec
83 ms
Visit shof.com now to see the best up-to-date Shof content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shof.com
Visit shof.comWe analyzed Shof.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
shof.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
1740 ms
417 ms
314 ms
107 ms
108 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Shof.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Shof.com.
Page size can be reduced by 24.3 kB (5%)
477.5 kB
453.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Shof.com main page is 477.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 233.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 486 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 576 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shof.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (96%)
53
2
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shof.com
1740 ms
premium-addons.min.css
417 ms
premium-addons.min.css
314 ms
style.min.css
107 ms
theme.min.css
108 ms
header-footer.min.css
134 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
314 ms
post-9.css
213 ms
ekiticons.css
213 ms
style.css
218 ms
widget-styles.css
318 ms
widget-styles-pro.css
447 ms
responsive.css
334 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.min.js
422 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
336 ms
jarallax.js
419 ms
post-10.css
421 ms
swiper.min.css
422 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
424 ms
style.css
526 ms
global.css
527 ms
elementskit-reset-button.css
529 ms
particles.css
528 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
539 ms
frontend-script.js
551 ms
widget-scripts.js
736 ms
anime.js
634 ms
parallax-frontend-scripts.js
632 ms
premium-wrapper-link.min.js
635 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
635 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
657 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
751 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
730 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
730 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
821 ms
hooks.min.js
740 ms
i18n.min.js
820 ms
frontend.min.js
819 ms
waypoints.min.js
823 ms
core.min.js
747 ms
frontend.min.js
768 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
820 ms
animate-circle.min.js
737 ms
elementor.js
738 ms
elementor.js
737 ms
elementskit-sticky-content.js
640 ms
elementskit-reset-button.js
667 ms
particles.min.js
724 ms
ekit-particles.js
723 ms
parallax-admin-scripts.js
641 ms
wrapper.js
640 ms
cotton.min.js
640 ms
mouse-cursor-scripts.js
686 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
18 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
22 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
26 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
30 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
31 ms
shof.com accessibility score
shof.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shof.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shof.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Shof.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shof.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shof. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: