Tools & Wizards About Us
shopduggal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

shopduggal.com

IIS Windows Server

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

shopduggal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Shopduggal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shopduggal.com

Leading provider of innovative print production, displays, and visual solutions. Explore our large format, signage, and digital services.

Visit shopduggal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shopduggal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shopduggal.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shopduggal.com

71 ms

duggal.com

252 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

81 ms

cleantalk-email-decoder.min.css

99 ms

style.min.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 158 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Shopduggal.com, 84% (133 requests) were made to Duggal.com and 11% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (527 ms) relates to the external source Duggal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (21%)

Content Size

7.3 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shopduggal.com main page is 7.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 190.7 kB

  • Original 243.3 kB
  • After minification 234.6 kB
  • After compression 52.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 190.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 415.0 kB

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 5.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shopduggal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 365.9 kB

  • Original 523.4 kB
  • After minification 523.4 kB
  • After compression 157.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 365.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 523.7 kB

  • Original 611.2 kB
  • After minification 603.1 kB
  • After compression 87.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shopduggal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 523.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (48%)

Requests Now

138

After Optimization

72

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 138 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shopduggal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

shopduggal.com

shopduggal.com

71 ms

duggal.com

duggal.com

252 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

81 ms

cleantalk-email-decoder.min.css

cleantalk-email-decoder.min.css

99 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

118 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

135 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

138 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

custom-frontend.min.css

211 ms

post-21.css

post-21.css

151 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

154 ms

custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css

custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css

161 ms

e-animation-grow.min.css

e-animation-grow.min.css

165 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

171 ms

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

246 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

243 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

198 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

207 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

211 ms

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

240 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

282 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

259 ms

global.css

global.css

309 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

275 ms

fadeInUp.min.css

fadeInUp.min.css

285 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

286 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

300 ms

widget-image-carousel.min.css

widget-image-carousel.min.css

313 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

322 ms

widget-forms.min.css

widget-forms.min.css

330 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

341 ms

post-25.css

post-25.css

375 ms

post-144.css

post-144.css

347 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

355 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

361 ms

post-137.css

post-137.css

379 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

382 ms

css

css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

420 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

32 ms

js

js

81 ms

lordicon.js

lordicon.js

36 ms

post-300.css

post-300.css

355 ms

post-361.css

post-361.css

322 ms

post-363.css

post-363.css

323 ms

post-364.css

post-364.css

327 ms

post-365.css

post-365.css

310 ms

post-380.css

post-380.css

308 ms

post-237.css

post-237.css

293 ms

post-1938.css

post-1938.css

303 ms

slideInRight.min.css

slideInRight.min.css

303 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

315 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

362 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

283 ms

purify.min.js

purify.min.js

273 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

284 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

292 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

281 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

275 ms

happy-addons.min.js

happy-addons.min.js

285 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

326 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

310 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

301 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

478 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

300 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

286 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

292 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

289 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

281 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

434 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

52 ms

25e400ca8e931300f435fbfcd5750f82.gif

25e400ca8e931300f435fbfcd5750f82.gif

65 ms

logo_black-2.png

logo_black-2.png

88 ms

logo_white-1.png

logo_white-1.png

228 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2024-08-20-at-10.41.59-1.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2024-08-20-at-10.41.59-1.jpeg

230 ms

IMG_8690-scaled.jpg

IMG_8690-scaled.jpg

364 ms

display-fixture-tradeshows.jpeg

display-fixture-tradeshows.jpeg

352 ms

Cretaive-Studio-scaled.jpg

Cretaive-Studio-scaled.jpg

372 ms

01_01_2018_kite-site-newyork-times-logo-large-1.png

01_01_2018_kite-site-newyork-times-logo-large-1.png

293 ms

BBC-Logo-300x169.png

BBC-Logo-300x169.png

293 ms

The-Washington-Post-Logo-e1722606939296-300x58.png

The-Washington-Post-Logo-e1722606939296-300x58.png

294 ms

Printing-Impressions-logo--300x40.png

Printing-Impressions-logo--300x40.png

303 ms

Yahoo-Logo.png

Yahoo-Logo.png

307 ms

BBC-Logo.png

BBC-Logo.png

304 ms

The-Washington-Post-Logo-e1722606939296.png

The-Washington-Post-Logo-e1722606939296.png

353 ms

Printing-Impressions-logo-.png

Printing-Impressions-logo-.png

345 ms

Toronto.jpg

Toronto.jpg

449 ms

Brasilia-1024x652.png

Brasilia-1024x652.png

414 ms

London-1024x576.jpeg

London-1024x576.jpeg

400 ms

paris-1024x606.jpg

paris-1024x606.jpg

413 ms

prague.jpg

prague.jpg

411 ms

Tokyo.jpg

Tokyo.jpg

444 ms

adidasLOGO.png

adidasLOGO.png

440 ms

verizonLOGO.png

verizonLOGO.png

444 ms

tourneauLOGO.png

tourneauLOGO.png

452 ms

tifany.png

tifany.png

450 ms

themetLOGO.png

themetLOGO.png

481 ms

Target.png

Target.png

447 ms

starbuLOGO.png

starbuLOGO.png

448 ms

smithsonianLOGO.png

smithsonianLOGO.png

447 ms

Revlon-e1725540133271-300x60.png

Revlon-e1725540133271-300x60.png

442 ms

polo22LOGO.png

polo22LOGO.png

456 ms

nikeLOGO.png

nikeLOGO.png

475 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

38 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

179 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

180 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

204 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

203 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

202 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

203 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

203 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

200 ms

nflLOGO.png

nflLOGO.png

462 ms

nbaLOGO.png

nbaLOGO.png

460 ms

momaLOGO.png

momaLOGO.png

467 ms

Group-1000003024.png

Group-1000003024.png

316 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

38 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

39 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

38 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf

38 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf

38 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf

39 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

40 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf

40 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf

40 ms

lvmhLOGO.png

lvmhLOGO.png

315 ms

loucoutinLOGO.png

loucoutinLOGO.png

337 ms

lorealLOGO.png

lorealLOGO.png

329 ms

LGLOGO.png

LGLOGO.png

313 ms

LbrandsLOGO.png

LbrandsLOGO.png

269 ms

lancomeLOGO.png

lancomeLOGO.png

277 ms

Group-1000003023.png

Group-1000003023.png

282 ms

hermesLOGO.png

hermesLOGO.png

292 ms

Group-1000003022.png

Group-1000003022.png

293 ms

gapLOGO.png

gapLOGO.png

295 ms

esteelauderLOGO.png

esteelauderLOGO.png

265 ms

Elizabeth-Arden-logo-full-long-1-300x61.png

Elizabeth-Arden-logo-full-long-1-300x61.png

266 ms

disneyLOGO.png

disneyLOGO.png

341 ms

diorLOGO.png

diorLOGO.png

336 ms

coachLOGO-1.png

coachLOGO-1.png

289 ms

Group-1000003021.png

Group-1000003021.png

295 ms

davidyurmanLOGO.png

davidyurmanLOGO.png

322 ms

coachLOGO.png

coachLOGO.png

330 ms

cliniqueLOGO.png

cliniqueLOGO.png

325 ms

clarinsLOGO.png

clarinsLOGO.png

306 ms

chanel22LOGO.png

chanel22LOGO.png

298 ms

cartierLOGO.png

cartierLOGO.png

328 ms

capitaloneLOGO.png

capitaloneLOGO.png

331 ms

bloomingdaleLOGO.png

bloomingdaleLOGO.png

331 ms

bathbodyworkLOGO.png

bathbodyworkLOGO.png

339 ms

avenueLOGO.png

avenueLOGO.png

315 ms

armaniLOGO.png

armaniLOGO.png

319 ms

americanexpressLOGO.png

americanexpressLOGO.png

326 ms

Elizabeth-Arden-logo-full-long-1.png

Elizabeth-Arden-logo-full-long-1.png

331 ms

Victoria-Secret-Logo-1024x576.png

Victoria-Secret-Logo-1024x576.png

346 ms

Revlon-e1725540133271.png

Revlon-e1725540133271.png

330 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2024-04-19-at-3.54.19-PM.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2024-04-19-at-3.54.19-PM.jpeg

527 ms

logo_black-1.png

logo_black-1.png

331 ms

logo_black.png

logo_black.png

455 ms

Accessibility Review

shopduggal.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shopduggal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shopduggal.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shopduggal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shopduggal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shopduggal.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shopduggal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: