2.5 sec in total
120 ms
2.1 sec
253 ms
Visit shoprichards.com now to see the best up-to-date Shoprichards content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shoprichards.com
Shop items by FauxFanciesCo.
Visit shoprichards.comWe analyzed Shoprichards.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
shoprichards.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value1,330 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
120 ms
91 ms
90 ms
65 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Shoprichards.com, 46% (36 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 20% (16 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (598 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (70%)
3.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Shoprichards.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shoprichards needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shoprichards.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (63%)
63
23
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shoprichards. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
shoprichards.com
120 ms
www.shoprichards.com
91 ms
bt
90 ms
require.min.js
65 ms
main-r.min.js
69 ms
viewer.css
83 ms
dynamicmodel
34 ms
377198_3f0db3a2eb863a88f8c2b7870c5f9316_1839.json.z
598 ms
377198_9bdd2e0042f505bd9b4c2caf59bff9cc_1837.json.z
577 ms
ugc-viewer
43 ms
bt
133 ms
skins.min.js
273 ms
components.min.js
35 ms
utils.min.js
41 ms
core.min.js
120 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
119 ms
lodash.min.js
119 ms
TweenMax.min.js
118 ms
layout.min.js
116 ms
tpa.min.js
268 ms
fonts.min.js
266 ms
animations.min.js
263 ms
swfobject.min.js
262 ms
mousetrap.min.js
264 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
264 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
265 ms
react-dom.min.js
265 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
266 ms
widgets.min.js
273 ms
experiment.js
272 ms
render.min.js
265 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
270 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
267 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
264 ms
zepto.min.js
262 ms
color.min.js
264 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
205 ms
bt
516 ms
bt
435 ms
liftedshadow_medium.png
198 ms
css
196 ms
latin.css
193 ms
377198_737a8791ddc95e6826492d4ed802ba4b.html
246 ms
377198_cdc39a2dad027dee953fe0d44dc1a8ce.html
285 ms
377198_6cd8a664c489015c0d71042c4a1812db.html
244 ms
377198_8aacdc574fed4e0aac3e9ae98b8c62b1.gif
330 ms
377198_b49c051d9d0c419eaefe7c4b00ed461c.png
341 ms
377198_917a3a57440f42a7816d169278f22720.jpg
352 ms
377198_0ad0feb676bd4b5c26a6a738a9c82d76.jpg
333 ms
b1cd13f9d4dfb1450bbb325285106177.png
280 ms
01113281ebb7dfb57a8dc2a02eb1cb92.png
279 ms
b1dba49d4e5dad0d56b4abfcd0cb2dcd.png
280 ms
377198_b37361eb72544f4084b9d28e9f385b02.png
370 ms
377198_60421eda612c443dae0d3bfeffec2418.jpg
337 ms
377198_c64106d2941c4347a349c32d2c06b66f.jpg
565 ms
377198_ef5f54472b6d482eaa89d711f3dba03b.png
532 ms
377198_8b63a370c3b84f8b81a00e71f2543d86.jpg
565 ms
3978993e99184d5e8c21f0204cd07bca.png
342 ms
bt
136 ms
bt
137 ms
bt
282 ms
shiny2button_bg.png
98 ms
sloppyhoriz.png
138 ms
sloppyvertical.png
136 ms
ironpatern.png
274 ms
skrew.png
133 ms
dc.js
278 ms
1_0_707070FF_505050FF_0_pageviews
342 ms
watch.js
280 ms
I27Pb-wEGH2ajLYP0QrtSInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
163 ms
-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
164 ms
8Hj8G_JpSADPYrRpzMno2i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
165 ms
03NMplHkN8ROgyklztlsOQ.ttf
165 ms
7-zMWCNNzmNM428U56wMq6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
164 ms
O_D1NAZVOFOobLbVtW3bconF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
158 ms
ugc-viewer
60 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
watch.js
433 ms
3978993e99184d5e8c21f0204cd07bca.png
44 ms
shoprichards.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
shoprichards.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
shoprichards.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shoprichards.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shoprichards.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shoprichards.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shoprichards. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: