2.2 sec in total
153 ms
2 sec
58 ms
Click here to check amazing SHORE CONTRACT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shorecontract.com
Turning workspaces into Awespaces is no simple task, it requires passion, incredible attention to detail, and great project flow from start to finish. shorecontract.com FF&E, Doors & Hardware, Archit...
Visit shorecontract.comWe analyzed Shorecontract.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
shorecontract.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
153 ms
27 ms
71 ms
26 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Shorecontract.com, 49% (33 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 28% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 410.1 kB (47%)
863.8 kB
453.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Shorecontract.com main page is 863.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 516.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 404.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 404.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SHORE CONTRACT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (21%)
48
38
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SHORE CONTRACT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shorecontract.com
153 ms
minified.js
27 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
71 ms
polyfill.min.js
26 ms
thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js
192 ms
main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js
191 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
192 ms
lodash.min.js
202 ms
react.production.min.js
200 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
201 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
198 ms
SHORETOTAL-Logotype--36.png
415 ms
bundle.min.js
251 ms
918ad4_81bb801f996b4a68936d83b39f74241f~mv2.jpeg
564 ms
RAL%20QDNA%202.png
606 ms
918ad4_a28f0150fb144ecabdef17f4d8fe4d87~mv2.png
486 ms
918ad4_fcbcc6a383be4af3aa8c86fd4e85415c~mv2.jpg
498 ms
918ad4_81bb801f996b4a68936d83b39f74241f~mv2.jpeg
532 ms
918ad4_d29b05a2d01d4121b5709154891c2cfd~mv2.jpg
544 ms
918ad4_b6af5b9e108742ac9376716b491d2319~mv2.jpg
740 ms
918ad4_b86093d42e134c8c905d806494276986~mv2.jpg
694 ms
918ad4_fb3cd3483e3646d0bfa4db05ed768578~mv2.jpg
803 ms
918ad4_0f6e2e6277594a3a95fe8baf90c3b786~mv2.jpg
816 ms
918ad4_e8e23d0b8d674869b62124fa11128a4a~mv2.jpeg
797 ms
918ad4_b4b56d5e39eb40668d1c3e475cbe367a~mv2.jpg
815 ms
918ad4_55c09c7ea57d408eb7378aefe2506b39~mv2.jpeg
914 ms
918ad4_ad71f98417a8455b9f3686bce4ec2558~mv2.jpeg
903 ms
918ad4_922688b5b0254ce5b8197d7da4bc3714~mv2.jpg
1026 ms
918ad4_4c486836f6e242e29613f240383788de~mv2.jpg
983 ms
918ad4_8d0389df6869460dab24b9af39a3958c~mv2.jpg
971 ms
RAL%20QDNA.png
985 ms
50c0f5_76815a01cc434fae886fcf5abca4b0a9~mv2.jpg
1129 ms
50c0f5_82ee1a580595498db803f1ee1f967cc4~mv2.jpg
1098 ms
50c0f5_d94fe0194a2345c88e4aa571141b35e6~mv2.jpg
1141 ms
50c0f5_499d1ec819a442338e1430efed12a1e4~mv2.jpg
1185 ms
50c0f5_0f0156f4c9874078b7a65e23e770ef67~mv2.jpg
1131 ms
50c0f5_793f8332dfce4b478e4e730df710997e~mv2.jpg
1178 ms
50c0f5_accd51e7a56f4a138eb05cb90cd254cb~mv2.jpg
1296 ms
50c0f5_c526da0af10d43078a05ad78a3f9b6e6~mv2.jpg
1313 ms
50c0f5_fd05fc70b4344dffaa7ee5ef7a9eef0b~mv2.jpg
1299 ms
50c0f5_b3a60eb359eb4507bf133b6892e1d3b1~mv2.jpg
1272 ms
50c0f5_4ceeb681dc4c4897bbfcc5418da71ae9~mv2.jpg
1450 ms
50c0f5_2eca293e734c469597076b1f77462852~mv2.jpg
1439 ms
50c0f5_0054bbf222af485b901cdfce2628eff9~mv2.jpg
1535 ms
RAL%20IC.png
1536 ms
p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff
4 ms
h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
32 ms
aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
34 ms
9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
33 ms
106 ms
102 ms
101 ms
98 ms
92 ms
95 ms
97 ms
97 ms
95 ms
93 ms
89 ms
88 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
21 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
4 ms
right-arrow.svg
16 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
7 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
6 ms
shorecontract.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
shorecontract.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
shorecontract.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shorecontract.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shorecontract.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shorecontract.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SHORE CONTRACT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: