2.2 sec in total
140 ms
1.6 sec
470 ms
Visit shoreprojects.com now to see the best up-to-date Shore Projects content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shoreprojects.com
Shore Projects is inspired by the beauty and fun of the seaside. Our ambition is to create timeless, quality watches that can be worn every day.
Visit shoreprojects.comWe analyzed Shoreprojects.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
shoreprojects.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value31.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value1.289
1/100
15%
Value32.4 s
0/100
10%
140 ms
222 ms
22 ms
37 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Shoreprojects.com, 42% (44 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Img.riskified.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (41%)
4.2 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Shoreprojects.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shore Projects images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shoreprojects.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (73%)
93
25
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shore Projects. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shoreprojects.com
140 ms
www.shoreprojects.com
222 ms
theme.scss.css
22 ms
reveal.css
37 ms
jquery-2.0.3.min.js
38 ms
jquery.reveal.js
37 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
72 ms
jquery.elevatezoom.js
72 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
81 ms
modernizr-2.5.3.min.js
88 ms
option_selection-04f21dade47c181126ac61b64d757485f84671daadfa90e4956a522cda4c2948.js
85 ms
bootstrap.min.css
87 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
110 ms
styles.css
112 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
111 ms
jquery.theme.js
118 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
127 ms
EventEmitter.min.js
120 ms
eventie.js
123 ms
imagesloaded.js
122 ms
jquery.fblogin.min.js
121 ms
ga_urchin_forms-0826cdefee6590321eb5c0c435eeebf7a8425a5493a9e95059c40e07e069ad52.js
121 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
5 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
9 ms
111454.ct.js
102 ms
bootstrap.min.js
186 ms
currencies.js
197 ms
jquery.currencies.min.js
199 ms
conversion.js
158 ms
3672
150 ms
assist.js
183 ms
oct.js
139 ms
shopify_stats.js
77 ms
trekkie.storefront.min.js
160 ms
shop_events_listener-42562f2f1fbae08782550a8da750cb16faca43c65b93366a62e3848a8245fa14.js
77 ms
ga.js
88 ms
fbds.js
142 ms
fbevents.js
214 ms
all.js
460 ms
WhiteShoreFlag.png
62 ms
gbp.png
62 ms
LOGO.png
56 ms
MASTER_HERO_BANNER_PROJECT_2_02.jpg
235 ms
MASTER_HERO_BANNER_PROJECT_2_02.jpg
127 ms
gift_box_banner_HOME_GBP.jpg
105 ms
handwrittenshoreprojects.jpg
110 ms
homepanellookbook2.jpg
123 ms
homepanelblog2.jpg
205 ms
homepanelinstagram2.jpg
177 ms
hr.jpg
123 ms
ShoreProjects_Facebook.jpg
207 ms
ShoreProjects_Twitter.jpg
205 ms
ShoreProjects_Instagram.jpg
203 ms
lqs.aspx
175 ms
Brandon_reg.otf
176 ms
170 ms
cbar.js.php
156 ms
Brandon_bld.otf
243 ms
Brandon_light.otf
130 ms
246 ms
identify
258 ms
record.gif
169 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
148 ms
3672
40 ms
3672
46 ms
3671
47 ms
180 ms
collect
92 ms
collect
179 ms
page
247 ms
dfm-analytics.min.js
92 ms
skimtag.shoreprojects.com.js
79 ms
3671
73 ms
adsct
247 ms
adsct
147 ms
data.js.php
223 ms
generic
60 ms
90 ms
90 ms
cm
40 ms
08e4fa76-c3bf-4db9-a94a-c35ae9e2b392
67 ms
generic
31 ms
pixel
75 ms
cs
39 ms
pixel.gif
38 ms
pixel
32 ms
62 ms
pixel
14 ms
xd_arbiter.php
215 ms
xd_arbiter.php
426 ms
beacon.riskified.com
120 ms
zendesk-embeddable.js
12 ms
ping
65 ms
49 ms
main.js
204 ms
image-l.gif
5 ms
image-l.gif
3 ms
image-l.gif
6 ms
image-l.gif
6 ms
image-l.gif
6 ms
image-l.gif
117 ms
update.html
61 ms
image-l.gif
138 ms
shoreprojects.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shoreprojects.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
shoreprojects.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shoreprojects.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shoreprojects.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shoreprojects.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shore Projects. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: