Tools & Wizards About Us
shoretechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

shoretechnology.com

Blue Cruise Yacht Charters Sailing Greece And Sailing Turkey With Bare Boats And Crewed Yachts Including Gulets

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

839 ms

Page Rendered

672 ms

shoretechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shoretechnology.com homepage info - get ready to check Shoretechnology best content right away, or after learning these important things about shoretechnology.com

Anglo-American charter sailing agency in Turkey representing charterers in selection from a range of yacht charter options including crewed yachts, crewed gulets, bare boats, and flotillas

Visit shoretechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shoretechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shoretechnology.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shoretechnology.com

205 ms

counter.js

20 ms

KaleView2.jpg

277 ms

OlymposBeach1.jpg

374 ms

reddot2.gif

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Shoretechnology.com, 10% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com and 10% (1 request) were made to C.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (634 ms) belongs to the original domain Shoretechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 147.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Shoretechnology.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 17.9 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 136.0 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shoretechnology images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shoretechnology. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

shoretechnology.com

shoretechnology.com

205 ms

counter.js

counter.js

20 ms

KaleView2.jpg

KaleView2.jpg

277 ms

OlymposBeach1.jpg

OlymposBeach1.jpg

374 ms

reddot2.gif

reddot2.gif

129 ms

FethiyeTombs2.jpg

FethiyeTombs2.jpg

325 ms

EkincikMyMarina2.jpg

EkincikMyMarina2.jpg

383 ms

AlexandersPath2.gif

AlexandersPath2.gif

134 ms

AlexanderSarco1.jpg

AlexanderSarco1.jpg

634 ms

t.php

t.php

88 ms

Accessibility Review

shoretechnology.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

shoretechnology.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

shoretechnology.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shoretechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shoretechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

shoretechnology.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shoretechnology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: