2.1 sec in total
431 ms
1.4 sec
237 ms
Click here to check amazing Shpg content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shpg.org
At ShareProgress, we help progressive organizations use the power of data and technology to grow their base and win their campaigns.
Visit shpg.orgWe analyzed Shpg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 431 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
shpg.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value780 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
431 ms
328 ms
521 ms
28 ms
393 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Shpg.org, 8% (3 requests) were made to Heapanalytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (521 ms) relates to the external source C.shpg.org.
Page size can be reduced by 438.3 kB (56%)
788.3 kB
350.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Shpg.org main page is 788.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 350.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shpg needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 219.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 171.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shpg.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (33%)
33
22
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shpg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shareprogress.org
431 ms
3597491879.js
328 ms
sp.js
521 ms
css
28 ms
www.shareprogress.org
393 ms
main.css
236 ms
jquery.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
305 ms
jquery.js
10 ms
mobile-nav.js
139 ms
modernizr.js
79 ms
main.js
152 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
42 ms
badgeLight.png
21 ms
shpg_logo.png
84 ms
menu_button.png
84 ms
do_good_bg.jpg
86 ms
sharing_home.png
19 ms
credo_logo.png
19 ms
greenpeace_logo.png
84 ms
sierra.png
84 ms
planned.png
85 ms
cel.png
140 ms
afl.png
139 ms
working.png
146 ms
consulting_home_tablet.png
147 ms
consulting_home.png
150 ms
badgeLight.png
62 ms
AvenirLTStd-Medium.woff
132 ms
ga.js
34 ms
heap-2729503397.js
61 ms
AvenirLTStd-Heavy.woff
151 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
sdk.js
268 ms
collect
59 ms
h
4 ms
shpg.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
shpg.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
shpg.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shpg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shpg.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shpg.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shpg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: