Tools & Wizards About Us
shroffeye.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

shroffeye.org

Shroff Eye Hospital Mumbai, Bandra west and Marine Drive

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

155 ms

shroffeye.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shroffeye.org homepage info - get ready to check Shroff Eye best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about shroffeye.org

Shroff Eye In Mumbai provides services of LASIK, Retina surgery, Cataract surgery, Relex Smile, Femto LASIK, C3r, Vision Therapy, Mumbai's Best eye surgeon's Dr Ashok Shroff, Dr Rahul Shroff...

Visit shroffeye.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Shroffeye.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shroffeye.org performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shroffeye.org

1637 ms

bootstrap.min.css

17 ms

meanmenu.css

143 ms

prettyPhoto.css

155 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Shroffeye.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Shroffeye.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 810.0 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

927.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shroffeye.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 673.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 128.8 kB

  • Original 150.3 kB
  • After minification 140.3 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 673.1 kB
  • After minification 669.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shroff Eye images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 350.3 kB

  • Original 511.8 kB
  • After minification 479.1 kB
  • After compression 161.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 327.2 kB

  • Original 401.8 kB
  • After minification 359.8 kB
  • After compression 74.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shroffeye.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 327.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (68%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shroff Eye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.shroffeye.org

www.shroffeye.org

1637 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

17 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

143 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

155 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

wp-video-lightbox.css

157 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

153 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

154 ms

settings.css

settings.css

206 ms

css

css

27 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

272 ms

style.css

style.css

217 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

14 ms

ubermenu.min.css

ubermenu.min.css

212 ms

fire.css

fire.css

209 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

272 ms

vertical-scroll-recent-post.js

vertical-scroll-recent-post.js

281 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

343 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

289 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

338 ms

video-lightbox.js

video-lightbox.js

336 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

410 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

364 ms

wp-fade-in-text-news.js

wp-fade-in-text-news.js

382 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

404 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

404 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

407 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

439 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

449 ms

my-autocomplete.js

my-autocomplete.js

470 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

388 ms

css

css

13 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

13 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

249 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

251 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1727 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

250 ms

functions.js

functions.js

265 ms

js

js

26 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

264 ms

flippy.js

flippy.js

275 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

274 ms

formValidation.js

formValidation.js

302 ms

floatlabels.js

floatlabels.js

323 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

8 ms

preloader.GIF

preloader.GIF

75 ms

shroff_logo2.png

shroff_logo2.png

109 ms

jci_logo.png

jci_logo.png

114 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

117 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

148 ms

Cataract-Optimized-image.jpg

Cataract-Optimized-image.jpg

365 ms

Retina-Optimized-image.jpg

Retina-Optimized-image.jpg

369 ms

LASIK-Optimized-image.jpg

LASIK-Optimized-image.jpg

311 ms

General-Optimized-image.jpg

General-Optimized-image.jpg

376 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

216 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

409 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

352 ms

video.png

video.png

548 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

71 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

72 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

73 ms

shortcodes-tablet.css

shortcodes-tablet.css

77 ms

shortcodes-mobile.css

shortcodes-mobile.css

82 ms

Accessibility Review

shroffeye.org accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shroffeye.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

shroffeye.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shroffeye.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shroffeye.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shroffeye.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shroff Eye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: