Tools & Wizards About Us
sibars.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

sibars.net

SibarS GoC

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

532 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

sibars.net screenshot

About Website

Visit sibars.net now to see the best up-to-date SibarS content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sibars.net

SibarS Inc - we are a Finance & ICT business solutions company, providing comprehensive technological and consultative support in addition to project management, strategic, and tactical assistance, in...

Visit sibars.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sibars.net page load time and found that the first response time was 532 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sibars.net performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sibars.net

532 ms

jcemediabox.min.css

137 ms

css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

395 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

407 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Sibars.net, 20% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Sibars.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

352.3 kB

After Optimization

322.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sibars.net main page is 352.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 180.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 180.5 kB
  • After minification 171.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SibarS images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 85.6 kB
  • After minification 85.6 kB
  • After compression 83.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 730 B

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sibars.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (73%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SibarS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sibars.net

sibars.net

532 ms

jcemediabox.min.css

jcemediabox.min.css

137 ms

css

css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

395 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

407 ms

font-awesome-v4-shims.min.css

font-awesome-v4-shims.min.css

280 ms

template.css

template.css

284 ms

preset2.css

preset2.css

435 ms

frontend-edit.css

frontend-edit.css

422 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

555 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

526 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

533 ms

jcemediabox.min.js

jcemediabox.min.js

695 ms

bootstrap.legacy.js

bootstrap.legacy.js

1320 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

661 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

663 ms

main.js

main.js

689 ms

frontend-edit.js

frontend-edit.js

792 ms

element.js

element.js

44 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

28 ms

SibarS_logo_225x82.png

SibarS_logo_225x82.png

140 ms

SibarS_logo_3_86x250.png

SibarS_logo_3_86x250.png

139 ms

en.png

en.png

1041 ms

ar.png

ar.png

237 ms

zh-CN.png

zh-CN.png

137 ms

fr.png

fr.png

138 ms

de.png

de.png

270 ms

it.png

it.png

270 ms

ja.png

ja.png

275 ms

es.png

es.png

274 ms

tr.png

tr.png

463 ms

96823_3201.png

96823_3201.png

664 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

119 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

14 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

18 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

20 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

22 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

643 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

390 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

529 ms

353 ms

hit

hit

264 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

14 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

14 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

13 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

5 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf

14 ms

hit

hit

515 ms

Accessibility Review

sibars.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sibars.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sibars.net SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sibars.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sibars.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sibars.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SibarS. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: