3.6 sec in total
941 ms
2.4 sec
221 ms
Visit siddig.net now to see the best up-to-date Siddig content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about siddig.net
Visit siddig.netWe analyzed Siddig.net page load time and found that the first response time was 941 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
siddig.net performance score
941 ms
400 ms
363 ms
403 ms
405 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Siddig.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (941 ms) belongs to the original domain Siddig.net.
Page size can be reduced by 235.4 kB (49%)
480.8 kB
245.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Siddig.net main page is 480.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 199.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Siddig images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siddig.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 119.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (53%)
40
19
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siddig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siddig.net
941 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
400 ms
better-social-font-icon.css
363 ms
style.css
403 ms
styles.css
405 ms
styles-rtl.css
401 ms
bw-style.min.css
546 ms
font-awesome.min.css
550 ms
style.css
557 ms
responsive.css
428 ms
siddig.net
731 ms
jquery.js
527 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
577 ms
picturefill.min.js
667 ms
customscript.js
676 ms
css
25 ms
element-query.min.js
701 ms
script.js
670 ms
jquery.form.min.js
785 ms
scripts.js
820 ms
skycons.js
847 ms
betterweather.min.js
864 ms
better-weather-widgets.js
890 ms
nobg.png
211 ms
wpid-fb_img_1456308576616-180x150.jpg
211 ms
tmp_11304-12051094406.png
551 ms
FG9R9aX-RIX_AvJI8USOWg.woff
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
468 ms
wpid-fb_img_1457826102367-203x150.jpg
172 ms
wpid-shutterstock_150064880-203x150.jpg
248 ms
wpid-fb_img_1457429676117-203x150.jpg
206 ms
wpid-fb_img_1457358872449-203x150.jpg
263 ms
wpid-screenshot_2016-03-07-10-37-26-203x150.jpg
311 ms
wpid-screenshot_2016-03-03-17-46-11-203x150.jpg
331 ms
wpid-cymera_20160227_024158-203x150.jpg
371 ms
wpid-n-ss-628x314-203x150.jpg
395 ms
wpid-fb_img_1456199542360-203x150.jpg
447 ms
wpid-cymera_20160222_033839-203x150.jpg
479 ms
wpid-cymera_20160222_033123-203x150.jpg
611 ms
all.js
70 ms
157 ms
xd_arbiter.php
90 ms
xd_arbiter.php
143 ms
siddig.net SEO score
EN
AR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siddig.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Arabic language. Our system also found out that Siddig.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siddig.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Siddig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: