5.2 sec in total
400 ms
4.4 sec
426 ms
Click here to check amazing Sidel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sidel.pt
Sidel is a leading provider of equipment, services and complete solutions for packaging liquids, foods, home and personal care products in PET, can, glass and other materials.
Visit sidel.ptWe analyzed Sidel.pt page load time and found that the first response time was 400 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sidel.pt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.733
6/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
400 ms
497 ms
618 ms
245 ms
481 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sidel.pt, 80% (56 requests) were made to Sidel.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Sidel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 256.0 kB (19%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sidel.pt main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 144.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sidel needs image optimization as it can save up to 144.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sidel.pt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (64%)
61
22
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sidel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sidel.pt
400 ms
www.sidel.com
497 ms
en
618 ms
Bootstrap.css
245 ms
style.css
481 ms
responsive.css
453 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
458 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
479 ms
featherlight.css
487 ms
featherlight.gallery.min.css
488 ms
download-box-specifics.css
565 ms
basic.css
573 ms
dropzone.css
598 ms
cookie-bar.css
596 ms
bootstrap-select.css
597 ms
font-awesome.css
605 ms
orn1bpi.css
675 ms
js
54 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
914 ms
popper.js
833 ms
bootstrap.min.js
728 ms
classie.js
728 ms
animatescroll.js
729 ms
js.cookie.js
798 ms
cookie-bar.js
838 ms
dropzone.js
952 ms
bootstrap-select.js
962 ms
velocity.min.js
896 ms
velocity.ui.min.js
948 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
954 ms
jquery.detect_swipe.min.js
1008 ms
featherlight.min.js
1024 ms
featherlight.gallery.min.js
1067 ms
common2.js
1072 ms
ws-tracking.js
17 ms
p.css
25 ms
gtm.js
74 ms
logo.svg
392 ms
logo_footer.png
395 ms
Technical_thumb_menu.jpg
453 ms
ico-search.svg
453 ms
ico-lock.svg
495 ms
Qual-IS.jpg
955 ms
ESG-2022.jpg
1090 ms
Aseptic_2024.jpg
982 ms
RoboAccess_Pal_S_thumb.jpg
1130 ms
Cermex_ProSelex_thumb.jpg
1319 ms
Super_combi_compact.jpg
1829 ms
PPMA_thumb.jpg
1190 ms
Fachpack-Sidel-thumb-banner.jpg
1222 ms
Sidel-GPT-thumb.jpg
1211 ms
Sidel-Cestbon-thumb.jpg
1241 ms
SSO_box_homepage_2024.jpg
1311 ms
Evo_on_home_thumb.jpg
1331 ms
01_contact.jpg
1343 ms
02_Technical_support.jpg
1352 ms
01_Working_at_Sidel.jpg
1441 ms
insight.min.js
92 ms
02_job_opportunities.jpg
1419 ms
menu-bck.svg
1425 ms
box-arrow.png
1399 ms
d
31 ms
d
41 ms
d
47 ms
d
48 ms
d
48 ms
d
60 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
142 ms
email_button.svg
1367 ms
W9TEGdWJ
366 ms
sidel.pt accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sidel.pt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sidel.pt SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sidel.pt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sidel.pt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sidel.pt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sidel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: