Tools & Wizards About Us
sidium.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

sidium.com

Sidium Solutions - IT Administration in the Mid-Atlantic

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

137 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

584 ms

sidium.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sidium.com homepage info - get ready to check Sidium best content right away, or after learning these important things about sidium.com

From Lancaster County Pennsylvania, Sidium Solutions provides IT services to businesses, non-profits and government agencies. No matter the location of your operation, whether in Lancaster, Allentown,...

Visit sidium.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sidium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sidium.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sidium.com

137 ms

sidium.com

674 ms

js

57 ms

style.min.css

165 ms

styles.css

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Sidium.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Sidium.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 513.8 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sidium.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 45.2 kB

  • Original 58.1 kB
  • After minification 52.0 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 133.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sidium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 163.3 kB

  • Original 466.5 kB
  • After minification 464.8 kB
  • After compression 303.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.3 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 172.3 kB

  • Original 222.5 kB
  • After minification 195.8 kB
  • After compression 50.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sidium.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (52%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sidium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sidium.com

sidium.com

137 ms

sidium.com

sidium.com

674 ms

js

js

57 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

165 ms

styles.css

styles.css

167 ms

style.css

style.css

276 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

168 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

283 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

168 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

219 ms

functions.js

functions.js

221 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

169 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

169 ms

index.js

index.js

222 ms

index.js

index.js

226 ms

api.js

api.js

70 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

278 ms

index.js

index.js

226 ms

wp-countup-show-counter.min.js

wp-countup-show-counter.min.js

278 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

76 ms

css2

css2

28 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

22 ms

stock-it-solutions-flipped.jpg

stock-it-solutions-flipped.jpg

112 ms

logo.png

logo.png

111 ms

it-support.jpg

it-support.jpg

78 ms

manage.jpg

manage.jpg

347 ms

cyber.jpg

cyber.jpg

316 ms

server-room.jpg

server-room.jpg

314 ms

partner-01.png

partner-01.png

111 ms

partner-02.png

partner-02.png

184 ms

partner-03.png

partner-03.png

184 ms

partner-04.png

partner-04.png

185 ms

partner-05.png

partner-05.png

268 ms

partner-06.png

partner-06.png

268 ms

partner-07.png

partner-07.png

351 ms

partner-08.png

partner-08.png

316 ms

partner-09.png

partner-09.png

316 ms

partner-10.jpg

partner-10.jpg

345 ms

partner-11.png

partner-11.png

350 ms

partner-12.jpg

partner-12.jpg

352 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

39 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf

34 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf

103 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

115 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

114 ms

anchor

anchor

35 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

10 ms

ir-ydOIl7T1o6_CJ5-TP2ENprJnWrhJr55f_5M34c1U.js

ir-ydOIl7T1o6_CJ5-TP2ENprJnWrhJr55f_5M34c1U.js

32 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

61 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

21 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

13 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

14 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

13 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

sidium.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sidium.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sidium.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sidium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sidium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sidium.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sidium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: