1.3 sec in total
210 ms
990 ms
97 ms
Visit siebold.com now to see the best up-to-date Siebold content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about siebold.com
Siebold | United States | United StatesPrinting Presses | Material Handling | Equipment Automation | Installation | Press Parts
Visit siebold.comWe analyzed Siebold.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
siebold.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value2.3 s
98/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
210 ms
51 ms
63 ms
52 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Siebold.com, 42% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (11 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (490 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 437.0 kB (46%)
949.3 kB
512.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Siebold.com main page is 949.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 443.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 350.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 350.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Siebold needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (41%)
27
16
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siebold. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.siebold.com
210 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
51 ms
minified.js
63 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
52 ms
polyfill.min.js
49 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
54 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
56 ms
lodash.min.js
56 ms
react.production.min.js
53 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
55 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
181 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
182 ms
9a9e26_e082016a653543fc830c2ba6d9f31d3a~mv2.jpeg
264 ms
bundle.min.js
68 ms
image003.jpg
166 ms
tsc%20company%20logo%20A.jpg
201 ms
Join%20Our%20Team.jpg
220 ms
image022.png
250 ms
TCS%20TRUCK.jpg
201 ms
DSC_0001_edited.jpg
367 ms
AdobeStock_278714800.jpeg
490 ms
Drive%20Cab%20pic%201.jpg
429 ms
AdobeStock_307431040.jpeg
395 ms
ironpatern.84ec58ff.png
28 ms
133 ms
128 ms
130 ms
130 ms
127 ms
123 ms
178 ms
178 ms
175 ms
168 ms
170 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
19 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
22 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
15 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
5 ms
siebold.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
siebold.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
siebold.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siebold.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siebold.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siebold.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Siebold. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: