Tools & Wizards About Us
sifam.fr screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sifam.fr

SIFAM

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

392 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

110 ms

sifam.fr screenshot

About Website

Visit sifam.fr now to see the best up-to-date SIFAM content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sifam.fr

SIFAM offre en Europe des équipements de qualité pour motards et 2-roues motorisés, incluant accessoires et consommables pour professionnels.

Visit sifam.fr

Key Findings

We analyzed Sifam.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 392 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sifam.fr performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sifam.fr

392 ms

fc7034c6c9ebf68d.css

197 ms

6519e6f958e792c1.css

251 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

349 ms

polyfill.min.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Sifam.fr, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Polyfill.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (840 ms) belongs to the original domain Sifam.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

626.8 kB

After Optimization

523.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sifam.fr main page is 626.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 353.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 59.4 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 145.6 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SIFAM needs image optimization as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 938 B

  • Original 353.8 kB
  • After minification 353.8 kB
  • After compression 352.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 150 B

  • Original 68.0 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB
  • After compression 67.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sifam.fr has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SIFAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sifam.fr

sifam.fr

392 ms

fc7034c6c9ebf68d.css

fc7034c6c9ebf68d.css

197 ms

6519e6f958e792c1.css

6519e6f958e792c1.css

251 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

349 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

8 ms

842.509c326f3eb4639b.js

842.509c326f3eb4639b.js

276 ms

webpack-5a70591441ec08c1.js

webpack-5a70591441ec08c1.js

277 ms

framework-0e8d27528ba61906.js

framework-0e8d27528ba61906.js

465 ms

main-21ea9bd1c89a797e.js

main-21ea9bd1c89a797e.js

295 ms

_app-1d83488842e5340c.js

_app-1d83488842e5340c.js

675 ms

23918f63-a39c1a093e99afb1.js

23918f63-a39c1a093e99afb1.js

363 ms

5691-9f1271a64a89a181.js

5691-9f1271a64a89a181.js

365 ms

6233-565facddc05c43bf.js

6233-565facddc05c43bf.js

386 ms

1922-48a122a8e5ce64c4.js

1922-48a122a8e5ce64c4.js

439 ms

1070-97914b10e9a09a34.js

1070-97914b10e9a09a34.js

444 ms

index-5f1ffa355462f5e0.js

index-5f1ffa355462f5e0.js

458 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

476 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

525 ms

logo-sifam.png

logo-sifam.png

532 ms

meca-user.png

meca-user.png

545 ms

moto.png

moto.png

553 ms

s-line-hover.png

s-line-hover.png

562 ms

gasoline-hover.png

gasoline-hover.png

607 ms

swaps-hover.png

swaps-hover.png

617 ms

osone-hover.png

osone-hover.png

697 ms

Marko-hover.png

Marko-hover.png

698 ms

eight_hover.png

eight_hover.png

696 ms

michelin-hover.png

michelin-hover.png

695 ms

pirelli-hover.png

pirelli-hover.png

707 ms

continental-hover.png

continental-hover.png

755 ms

bridgestone-hover.png

bridgestone-hover.png

782 ms

metzeler-hover.png

metzeler-hover.png

785 ms

duro-hover.png

duro-hover.png

787 ms

kyoto-hover.png

kyoto-hover.png

789 ms

dunlop-hover.png

dunlop-hover.png

795 ms

soldes-blurred.jpg

soldes-blurred.jpg

840 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

28 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

35 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

47 ms

Accessibility Review

sifam.fr accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sifam.fr best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sifam.fr SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sifam.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is French. Our system also found out that Sifam.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sifam.fr

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SIFAM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: