5.1 sec in total
986 ms
3.4 sec
743 ms
Welcome to siftagent.com homepage info - get ready to check Siftagent best content right away, or after learning these important things about siftagent.com
Visit siftagent.comWe analyzed Siftagent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 986 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
siftagent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value3.1 s
76/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
986 ms
74 ms
85 ms
78 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Siftagent.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (986 ms) belongs to the original domain Siftagent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 260.1 kB (44%)
596.0 kB
335.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Siftagent.com main page is 596.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 258.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Siftagent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siftagent.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (49%)
79
40
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siftagent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.siftagent.com
986 ms
css
74 ms
css
85 ms
screen.css
78 ms
styles.css
102 ms
jquery.js
137 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
104 ms
jquery-2.1.3.min.js
141 ms
global.js
136 ms
anchors.navigation.js
140 ms
jquery.viewportchecker.min.js
163 ms
jquery.form.min.js
165 ms
scripts.js
171 ms
wp-embed.min.js
172 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
222 ms
menu-icon-1.png
143 ms
menu-icon-2.png
144 ms
menu-icon-3.png
144 ms
menu-icon-4.png
146 ms
menu-icon-5.png
147 ms
logo-tale.png
147 ms
logo-face.png
148 ms
logo.png
149 ms
image-1.png
147 ms
image-2.png
148 ms
image-3.png
362 ms
image-4.png
362 ms
image-5.png
362 ms
image-6.png
363 ms
image-7.png
362 ms
image-8.png
364 ms
image-9.png
364 ms
image-10.png
366 ms
image-15.png
378 ms
transparent.png
367 ms
image-13.png
368 ms
image-14.png
367 ms
image-14_pulse.png
369 ms
image-11.png
370 ms
image-12.png
373 ms
logo-1.png
370 ms
dashed-angle-left.png
374 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
126 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
124 ms
dashed-horizontal.png
359 ms
dashed-vertical.png
355 ms
image-16.png
343 ms
dashed-angle-right.png
334 ms
image-17.png
333 ms
image-18.png
328 ms
image-19.png
327 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04z306qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
228 ms
xgzbb53t8j-Mo-vYa23n5onF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
228 ms
image-20.png
256 ms
image-21.png
247 ms
image-22.png
248 ms
image-24.png
283 ms
image-23.png
285 ms
image-25.jpg
283 ms
core-entry-arrow.png
280 ms
image-26.jpg
288 ms
image-27.jpg
282 ms
image-28.jpg
281 ms
3205101906.png
286 ms
image-29.png
76 ms
image-30.png
82 ms
image-31.png
82 ms
image-32.png
78 ms
image-33.png
110 ms
image-33_mouse.png
108 ms
image-34.png
113 ms
image-35.png
115 ms
image-36.png
145 ms
image-37.png
137 ms
image-38.png
141 ms
image-39.png
158 ms
image-40.png
158 ms
image-41.png
157 ms
image-42.png
179 ms
image-43.png
175 ms
image-44.png
239 ms
image-44_.png
197 ms
gilmedia-logo.png
202 ms
ajax-loader.gif
189 ms
siftagent.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
siftagent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
siftagent.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siftagent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Siftagent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siftagent.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Siftagent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: