Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

sightdoing.net

sightDOING — Take Your Sightseeing to the Next Level

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

sightdoing.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SightDOING content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sightdoing.net

SightDOING is a travel guide with unique twists to sightseeing. Add hands-on experiences, new discoveries, and participatory activities to your next adventure.

Visit sightdoing.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sightdoing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sightdoing.net performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,450 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sightdoing.net

104 ms

sightdoing.net

308 ms

autoptimize_d209186163e5ce1dd8a33202f9c1db17.css

49 ms

autoptimize_single_17c30a37806a007199eb92a0ecdba9f6.css

84 ms

autoptimize_single_6cdce781ce84f40800de9568ed72c0e4.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Sightdoing.net, 21% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Websitedemos.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) relates to the external source Websitedemos.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

879.7 kB

After Optimization

771.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Sightdoing.net main page is 879.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 673.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 102.2 kB

  • Original 121.0 kB
  • After minification 121.0 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 673.8 kB
  • After minification 669.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SightDOING images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 503 B

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 26.4 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 58.5 kB
  • After minification 58.5 kB
  • After compression 56.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sightdoing.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SightDOING. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sightdoing.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sightdoing.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sightdoing.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sightdoing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sightdoing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SightDOING. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: