1.6 sec in total
98 ms
960 ms
509 ms
Click here to check amazing SightDOING content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sightdoing.net
SightDOING is a travel guide with unique twists to sightseeing. Add hands-on experiences, new discoveries, and participatory activities to your next adventure.
Visit sightdoing.netWe analyzed Sightdoing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
sightdoing.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value3,450 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
98 ms
587 ms
51 ms
33 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Sightdoing.net, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (587 ms) belongs to the original domain Sightdoing.net.
Page size can be reduced by 88.6 kB (16%)
562.2 kB
473.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Sightdoing.net main page is 562.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 365.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SightDOING images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 503 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sightdoing.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)
23
11
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SightDOING. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sightdoing.net
98 ms
sightdoing.net
587 ms
autoptimize_f19cc252f1ff5dad991db6a189f77f01.css
51 ms
autoptimize_single_b22e83092f442fa0f3d2552f54d788e3.css
33 ms
autoptimize_single_54d9a7eaab5057048fa9e734ff19bd74.css
28 ms
autoptimize_single_bccef7b46a2b5f2fe369751062569bcd.css
22 ms
autoptimize_single_654f9a913c8f8a16d47ec28976c304da.css
23 ms
the-girl-and-globe.js
18 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
lazysizes.min.js
14 ms
autoptimize_single_81ca236fa29cdd0407ffeffe670f97d5.js
15 ms
autoptimize_8e1a502ce15c8571a5bf956327d9171d.js
19 ms
analytics.js
89 ms
webfont.js
86 ms
vector01-free-img.png
115 ms
Sedona-Front-Page-New.jpg
77 ms
what-to-wear-in-norway-in-summer-750x750.jpg
75 ms
world.jpg
76 ms
US-FLAG.jpg
74 ms
Nicaragua.jpg
75 ms
vector02-free-img.png
119 ms
sightdoing-logo-233x54.png
31 ms
astra.woff
44 ms
css
42 ms
collect
19 ms
js
75 ms
font
15 ms
font
16 ms
font
17 ms
sightdoing.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sightdoing.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sightdoing.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sightdoing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sightdoing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sightdoing.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SightDOING. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: