Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

sightmatters.com

SightMatters | Your Resource for Macular Degeneration

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

334 ms

sightmatters.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sightmatters.com now to see the best up-to-date Sight Matters content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sightmatters.com

You've been diagnosed with macular degeneration—now what? SightMatters offers expert information, tools and support to help you manage your condition and live your best life.

Visit sightmatters.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sightmatters.com page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sightmatters.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.274

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sightmatters.com

68 ms

f398a54001d73.js

197 ms

jquery.js

44 ms

jquery-ui.js

68 ms

bootstrap.min.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Sightmatters.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.fonts.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (437 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.fonts.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

909.1 kB

After Optimization

786.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Sightmatters.com main page is 909.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 498.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 37.9 kB

  • Original 53.5 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 32 B

  • Original 297.3 kB
  • After minification 297.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sight Matters images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 75.2 kB

  • Original 498.0 kB
  • After minification 498.0 kB
  • After compression 422.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 60.4 kB
  • After minification 60.4 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sightmatters.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (55%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sight Matters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sightmatters.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sightmatters.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sightmatters.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sightmatters.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sightmatters.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sight Matters. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: