8.5 sec in total
909 ms
6.4 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to sigicom.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Sigicom best content right away, or after learning these important things about sigicom.co.uk
Sigicom offers a complete solution and instrumentation for remote construction site monitoring - vibration, noise and dust.
Visit sigicom.co.ukWe analyzed Sigicom.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 909 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sigicom.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value34.4 s
0/100
25%
Value17.7 s
0/100
10%
Value10,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
909 ms
181 ms
105 ms
525 ms
625 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sigicom.co.uk, 29% (10 requests) were made to Wwwsigicomse.cdn.triggerfish.cloud and 6% (2 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source Consentcdn.cookiebot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (16%)
9.0 MB
7.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sigicom.co.uk main page is 9.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sigicom needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 119.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)
32
16
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigicom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sigicom.com
909 ms
gtm.js
181 ms
uc.js
105 ms
style.min.css
525 ms
style.min.css
625 ms
jfa0pjl.js
347 ms
jquery.min.js
571 ms
app.min.js
535 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
480 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
983 ms
dom-ready.min.js
918 ms
hooks.min.js
733 ms
i18n.min.js
734 ms
a11y.min.js
778 ms
jquery.json.min.js
910 ms
gravityforms.min.js
934 ms
api.js
172 ms
configuration.js
5033 ms
cc.js
163 ms
bv_certification_iso9001_iso14001.jpg
566 ms
logo.svg
747 ms
rating-eng-1.png
361 ms
di-gasell_logo_mstargasell-1-436x600.png
1215 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
bc-v4.min.html
36 ms
infra-3-miljbild-sigicom-noresize.jpg
1143 ms
the-infra-system-3.png
1014 ms
workshop-charles-downing-sigicom.jpg
980 ms
sky-dive-1.png
1147 ms
infra-c22-catm-2.2
1527 ms
73111580_2823652677679461_7341995336925184000_o-3.png
2045 ms
nedim.png
1922 ms
bg-dots.svg
434 ms
fontello.woff
738 ms
collect
12 ms
sigicom.co.uk accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sigicom.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sigicom.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigicom.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigicom.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sigicom.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sigicom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: