Tools & Wizards About Us
sigmaefficiency.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

sigmaefficiency.com

Retail and Supply Chain Specialists - improving your peformance

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

sigmaefficiency.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sigmaefficiency.com homepage info - get ready to check Sigmaefficiency best content right away, or after learning these important things about sigmaefficiency.com

Sigma Efficiency are retail and supply chain specialists. "We inspire and support retailers to solve complex business issues, realising significant and sustainable bottom-line profit improvements." 

Visit sigmaefficiency.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigmaefficiency.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigmaefficiency.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,790 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigmaefficiency.com

45 ms

sigmaefficiency.com

116 ms

wpo-minify-header-bf8c3105.min.css

37 ms

ykd7dzt.css

154 ms

wpo-minify-header-c1e50ffc.min.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Sigmaefficiency.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 11% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) relates to the external source Use.fontawesome.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 168.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sigmaefficiency.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 161.7 kB
  • After minification 144.9 kB
  • After compression 27.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sigmaefficiency images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 803.3 kB
  • After minification 803.3 kB
  • After compression 769.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 131 B

  • Original 72.8 kB
  • After minification 72.8 kB
  • After compression 72.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigmaefficiency.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigmaefficiency. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sigmaefficiency.com

sigmaefficiency.com

45 ms

sigmaefficiency.com

sigmaefficiency.com

116 ms

wpo-minify-header-bf8c3105.min.css

wpo-minify-header-bf8c3105.min.css

37 ms

ykd7dzt.css

ykd7dzt.css

154 ms

wpo-minify-header-c1e50ffc.min.css

wpo-minify-header-c1e50ffc.min.css

52 ms

wpo-minify-header-8bc30956.min.js

wpo-minify-header-8bc30956.min.js

65 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

87 ms

js

js

126 ms

js

js

142 ms

api.js

api.js

94 ms

wpo-minify-footer-a11a110c.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-a11a110c.min.js

61 ms

all.js

all.js

614 ms

wpo-minify-footer-7bae0e80.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-7bae0e80.min.js

73 ms

p.css

p.css

38 ms

hompage_image.jpg

hompage_image.jpg

190 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

201 ms

bullet.svg

bullet.svg

139 ms

AdobeStock_236915193-scaled.jpeg

AdobeStock_236915193-scaled.jpeg

186 ms

IMG_5603-1-scaled-e1594720626581.jpg

IMG_5603-1-scaled-e1594720626581.jpg

188 ms

IMG_5454-scaled-e1594907523983.jpg

IMG_5454-scaled-e1594907523983.jpg

189 ms

warehouse-1.jpg

warehouse-1.jpg

188 ms

left-bg.svg

left-bg.svg

288 ms

right-bg.svg

right-bg.svg

284 ms

centre-bg.svg

centre-bg.svg

198 ms

d

d

111 ms

d

d

134 ms

d

d

154 ms

d

d

154 ms

d

d

164 ms

d

d

163 ms

js

js

205 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

236 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

325 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

326 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

326 ms

anchor

anchor

71 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

14 ms

9WFGRKJPCYDnPNtkHsd9A4DmYMQ5DrBGEy3ZqrvSuE0.js

9WFGRKJPCYDnPNtkHsd9A4DmYMQ5DrBGEy3ZqrvSuE0.js

37 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

72 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

23 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

37 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

45 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

sigmaefficiency.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sigmaefficiency.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sigmaefficiency.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigmaefficiency.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigmaefficiency.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sigmaefficiency.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sigmaefficiency. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: