Tools & Wizards About Us
signaturesslkt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

signaturesslkt.com

Signature Signs & Stitchery | Signs & Signage Northern Ontario

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

916 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

signaturesslkt.com screenshot

About Website

Visit signaturesslkt.com now to see the best up-to-date Signature Sslkt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about signaturesslkt.com

Visit signaturesslkt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Signaturesslkt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 916 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

signaturesslkt.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.448

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.signaturesslkt.com

916 ms

styles.css

23 ms

lytebox.css

21 ms

all.css

130 ms

style-static.min.css

172 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Signaturesslkt.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Sitedudes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (916 ms) belongs to the original domain Signaturesslkt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (45%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Signaturesslkt.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 68.6 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 79.8 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signature Sslkt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 331.6 kB

  • Original 661.7 kB
  • After minification 660.3 kB
  • After compression 330.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 331.6 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 839.1 kB

  • Original 951.2 kB
  • After minification 948.8 kB
  • After compression 112.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signaturesslkt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 839.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (51%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signature Sslkt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.signaturesslkt.com

www.signaturesslkt.com

916 ms

styles.css

styles.css

23 ms

lytebox.css

lytebox.css

21 ms

all.css

all.css

130 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

172 ms

style.css

style.css

38 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

162 ms

lytebox.js

lytebox.js

20 ms

lytebox.css

lytebox.css

54 ms

lytebox.js

lytebox.js

89 ms

Logo.jpeg

Logo.jpeg

30 ms

Websiet-2.jpeg

Websiet-2.jpeg

37 ms

314-1.jpg

314-1.jpg

30 ms

308-1.jpg

308-1.jpg

33 ms

219.jpg

219.jpg

32 ms

133.jpg

133.jpg

31 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

27 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

72 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

225 ms

index.js

index.js

21 ms

index.js

index.js

20 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

37 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

20 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

86 ms

common.js

common.js

22 ms

api.js

api.js

55 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

29 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

32 ms

index.js

index.js

51 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

32 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

54 ms

icon-facebook-50.png

icon-facebook-50.png

47 ms

icon-instagram-50.png

icon-instagram-50.png

47 ms

sd-footer-all-white.png

sd-footer-all-white.png

46 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

117 ms

1-1.jpg

1-1.jpg

119 ms

2-1.jpg

2-1.jpg

118 ms

4-1.jpg

4-1.jpg

119 ms

10-1.jpg

10-1.jpg

71 ms

236.jpg

236.jpg

119 ms

Website-Photo.jpeg

Website-Photo.jpeg

118 ms

office2.jpg

office2.jpg

119 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

14 ms

Accessibility Review

signaturesslkt.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

signaturesslkt.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

signaturesslkt.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signaturesslkt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signaturesslkt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

signaturesslkt.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Signature Sslkt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: