Tools & Wizards About Us
signere.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

signere.no

Pålitelige digitale identitetsløsninger - Signicat

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

signere.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to signere.no homepage info - get ready to check Signere best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about signere.no

Ett integreringspunkt for grenseoverskridende digital identitet - fra inrullering til sikker autentisering og elektronisk signering

Visit signere.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Signere.no page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

signere.no performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

signere.no

2286 ms

www.signere.no

743 ms

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

stylesheet

293 ms

css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Signere.no, 29% (7 requests) were made to Signere-blog.azurewebsites.net and 8% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Signere.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.1 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

916.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Signere.no main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 753.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 36.2 kB
  • After minification 24.0 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 753.6 kB
  • After minification 750.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signere images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 173.6 kB

  • Original 287.0 kB
  • After minification 286.9 kB
  • After compression 113.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.6 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 219.6 kB

  • Original 266.2 kB
  • After minification 266.1 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signere.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (38%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signere. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

signere.no

signere.no

2286 ms

www.signere.no

www.signere.no

743 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

stylesheet

stylesheet

293 ms

css

css

63 ms

5ansatte-.png

5ansatte-.png

1260 ms

Logoer_Samarbeidsp_2.png

Logoer_Samarbeidsp_2.png

986 ms

OLKTqJLoBDM

OLKTqJLoBDM

101 ms

bankid.png

bankid.png

1017 ms

BankID2.07.png

BankID2.07.png

1478 ms

image.png

image.png

779 ms

scripts

scripts

620 ms

bn_bank_logo.png

bn_bank_logo.png

779 ms

websystemer.png

websystemer.png

705 ms

sib_logo.png

sib_logo.png

804 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

23 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

46 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

136 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

136 ms

logo-signere.svg

logo-signere.svg

463 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

51 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

617 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

75 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

Accessibility Review

signere.no accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

signere.no best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

signere.no SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signere.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Signere.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

signere.no

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Signere. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: