Tools & Wizards About Us
signetmarking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

signetmarking.com

Thermal Print Heads|Hot Stamp Ribbons|Thermal Transfer Ribbons

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

177 ms

signetmarking.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Signetmarking content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about signetmarking.com

Thermal Print heads,Thermal Transfer Ribbons, Hot Stamp Ribbons, Replacement Steel Type. Low cost replacement marking devices, Norwood steel type, Markem steel type.. Since 1969

Visit signetmarking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Signetmarking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

signetmarking.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

signetmarking.com

187 ms

signetmarking.com

291 ms

bootstrap.css

136 ms

font-awesome.min.css

198 ms

theme.css

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Signetmarking.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Lphcrm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (433 ms) relates to the external source Lphcrm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

172.2 kB

After Optimization

120.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Signetmarking.com main page is 172.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 75.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 12.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signetmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 62.0 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 54.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 71.3 kB
  • After compression 47.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signetmarking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (49%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signetmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

signetmarking.com

signetmarking.com

187 ms

signetmarking.com

signetmarking.com

291 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

136 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

198 ms

theme.css

theme.css

205 ms

theme-elements.css

theme-elements.css

202 ms

theme-animate.css

theme-animate.css

197 ms

default.css

default.css

199 ms

custom.css

custom.css

201 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

19 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

274 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

274 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

338 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

277 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

278 ms

jquery-cookie.js

jquery-cookie.js

278 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

334 ms

common.js

common.js

328 ms

theme.js

theme.js

335 ms

custom.js

custom.js

332 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

332 ms

validator.js

validator.js

394 ms

home-banner.webp

home-banner.webp

250 ms

qltyseal.webp

qltyseal.webp

187 ms

hmimga.webp

hmimga.webp

188 ms

hmimgb.webp

hmimgb.webp

189 ms

hmimgc.webp

hmimgc.webp

191 ms

steel-img.webp

steel-img.webp

248 ms

hmimge.webp

hmimge.webp

252 ms

hmimgf.webp

hmimgf.webp

252 ms

hmimgg.webp

hmimgg.webp

255 ms

hmimgh.webp

hmimgh.webp

257 ms

foticobg.webp

foticobg.webp

313 ms

footeicoa.webp

footeicoa.webp

315 ms

footeicob.webp

footeicob.webp

317 ms

footeicoc.webp

footeicoc.webp

317 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

319 ms

lph-statistics.html

lph-statistics.html

139 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

433 ms

Accessibility Review

signetmarking.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

signetmarking.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

signetmarking.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signetmarking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signetmarking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

signetmarking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Signetmarking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: