3.8 sec in total
272 ms
2.7 sec
768 ms
Visit signia.net now to see the best up-to-date Signia content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about signia.net
Be Brilliant with Signia Hearing Aids and take your hearing performance to the next level. Visit the Official Signia Website today for more information.
Visit signia.netWe analyzed Signia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
signia.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value2,360 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
272 ms
382 ms
894 ms
37 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Signia.net, 55% (36 requests) were made to Cdn.signia.net and 14% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) belongs to the original domain Signia.net.
Page size can be reduced by 144.2 kB (6%)
2.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Signia.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 72 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signia.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (40%)
53
32
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
signia.net
272 ms
signia.net
382 ms
www.signia.net
894 ms
shared.34385ec89b31ad1f0149.css
37 ms
signia.3dc2cd8f5fbf65138c18.css
45 ms
rxt2efr.css
130 ms
gibson.e0bb1d1768d545d8bcb8.css
57 ms
jquery-2.1.3.min.js
178 ms
form_tracking.5d9aaa0def0fab42924b.js
58 ms
notice
100 ms
trustarc_middleware.f20178ecd2af5ad91d73.js
58 ms
menuBar.8ac6e3b5beb2f4c5a399.js
57 ms
scrollingHero.2c52fd058d62915e831c.js
61 ms
shopFinderFilterRenderer.a8aec4afe704dfe6c10b.js
7 ms
bundle.a365d9e4104c7ae8fbed.js
5 ms
signia_js.73748eefdd8d760777ac.js
6 ms
p.css
29 ms
uifbvnhu.js
807 ms
carousel-arrow.svg
105 ms
tcafRiZeJeg
170 ms
styletto-ix_group-conversation_modified_1920x1080.jpg
148 ms
insio-ix_couple-laughing_modified_1920x1080.jpg
147 ms
pure-charge-go-ix_lab_group-conversation-02_modified_1920x1080.jpg
147 ms
silk-ix_bouldering_group-conversation_modified_ces_1920x1080.jpg
147 ms
signia-ix_coach-with-kids-circle_blur-left_1920x1080.jpg
146 ms
signia-soundwave_1920x700.jpg
146 ms
styletto-ix_woman-head-sideview_circle_montage_1000x1000.jpg
175 ms
pure-charge-go-ix_lab_woman-holding-hearing-aids_circle_montage_1000x1000.jpg
190 ms
silk-ix_bouldering_man-backview_circle_montage_1000x1000.jpg
193 ms
insio-ix_woman-holding-hearing-aid_circle_montage_1000x1000.jpg
174 ms
styletto-ix_woman-with-smartphone_close-up_screen-assistant_1200x800.jpg
189 ms
styletto-ix_black_silver_double_1920x1080.jpg
173 ms
pure-charge-go-ix_graphite_pair_shadow_1920x1080.jpg
228 ms
silk-charge-go-ix_black_pair_shadow_1920x1080.jpg
227 ms
insio-ix_iic_double_1920x1080.jpg
227 ms
signia-active_gold_pair_beauty_1920x1080.jpg
228 ms
motion_cng_x_pair_silver_hero_1920x1080.jpg
764 ms
hearing-test-icon_grey_1000x1000_smaller.png
228 ms
maps-icon_grey_1000x1000_smaller.png
230 ms
newsletter-icon_grey_1000x1000_smaller.png
228 ms
youtube-icon_white_32px.svg
229 ms
facebook-icon_white_32px.svg
230 ms
instagram-icon_white_32px.svg
231 ms
linkedin-icon_white_32px.svg
234 ms
signia-icon-logo-small.svg
235 ms
update.min.js
179 ms
d
72 ms
d
113 ms
d
401 ms
d
130 ms
d
130 ms
d
130 ms
d
112 ms
d
401 ms
www-player.css
25 ms
www-embed-player.js
66 ms
base.js
101 ms
update.show.min.js
225 ms
QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js
93 ms
embed.js
48 ms
f.png
366 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
124 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
124 ms
Create
95 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
gtuifbvnhu.js
205 ms
signia.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
signia.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
signia.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signia.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
signia.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Signia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: