1.6 sec in total
80 ms
1.4 sec
104 ms
Welcome to signstream.net homepage info - get ready to check Signstream best content right away, or after learning these important things about signstream.net
The easiest way to get your images, videos and internet content to display on all your TVs, tablets and Amazon firestick. SignStream.net provides Cloud-Based Digital Signage solutions for small busine...
Visit signstream.netWe analyzed Signstream.net page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
signstream.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
80 ms
63 ms
205 ms
111 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Signstream.net, 53% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 20% (6 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (598 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 450.2 kB (68%)
662.9 kB
212.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Signstream.net main page is 662.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 544.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 431.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 431.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Signstream needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 64 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)
23
13
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
signstream.net
80 ms
www.signstream.net
63 ms
www.customtvchannel.com
205 ms
minified.js
111 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
106 ms
polyfill.min.js
308 ms
bootstrap-features.24d4529b.bundle.min.js
377 ms
main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js
386 ms
lodash.min.js
385 ms
react.production.min.js
376 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
366 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
368 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
369 ms
182045.js
458 ms
b1c613_cbce61ebdc124b86bdcf1e527312631e~mv2.png
510 ms
thunderbolt
371 ms
e61c82_07e0810b0b5c46c0bad19e0b5262a637~mv2.png
598 ms
b1c613_c3caced7b64d442aa8d1dbc2a2e1cf6df000.jpg
526 ms
c6d71c_49e5d90ac5c54de69bf8a6659a32f3b2~mv2.png
540 ms
c6d71c_ea510e5643bb4d1c8b6d8bfc900ded26~mv2_d_3402_2030_s_2.png
562 ms
IMG_1195.jpg
563 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
24 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
33 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
32 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
34 ms
thunderbolt
15 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
16 ms
bolt-performance
27 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
25 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
signstream.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
signstream.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
signstream.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signstream.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signstream.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
signstream.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Signstream. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: