1.5 sec in total
75 ms
783 ms
627 ms
Visit silc.com now to see the best up-to-date Silc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about silc.com
Empowering machines with LiDAR to see like humans. SiLC brings AI and Robotics together with Drone, Robotic and Long Range LiDAR solutions.
Visit silc.comWe analyzed Silc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
silc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
75 ms
93 ms
18 ms
38 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Silc.com, 28% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (27%)
5.5 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Silc.com main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Silc needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 94.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (79%)
58
12
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
silc.com
75 ms
www.silc.com
93 ms
style.css
18 ms
style.css
38 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
77 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
68 ms
swiper.min.css
62 ms
post-8.css
75 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
72 ms
all.min.css
77 ms
v4-shims.min.css
83 ms
global.css
86 ms
post-11.css
106 ms
post-10.css
88 ms
style.min.css
88 ms
font-awesome.min.css
91 ms
post-56.css
104 ms
hover-css.css
105 ms
ha-56.css
109 ms
css
117 ms
fontawesome.min.css
98 ms
solid.min.css
109 ms
brands.min.css
112 ms
jquery.min.js
112 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
108 ms
v4-shims.min.js
109 ms
js
235 ms
custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css
109 ms
animations.min.css
199 ms
primary-navigation.js
111 ms
responsive-embeds.js
110 ms
happy-addons.min.js
111 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
220 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
218 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
220 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
221 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
222 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
222 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
230 ms
hooks.min.js
208 ms
i18n.min.js
206 ms
frontend.min.js
193 ms
waypoints.min.js
176 ms
core.min.js
167 ms
frontend.min.js
164 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
164 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
163 ms
cropped-Logo.png
40 ms
1.png
42 ms
hom-imggb-2.png
49 ms
hom-img1.png
43 ms
hom-img2.png
45 ms
hom-img3.png
46 ms
28c83e_1927a2234bda4100b2041e01a6ba65ee_mv2.webp
43 ms
abt-testi-1.png
48 ms
hom-imggb-4.png
116 ms
eye.png
43 ms
polyfills.js
155 ms
embed.js
224 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
133 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
149 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
149 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf
149 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf
149 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf
149 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
148 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf
192 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf
192 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
193 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
192 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
191 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
191 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
235 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
234 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
236 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
233 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
233 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
235 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
259 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
261 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
261 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
258 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
261 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
128 ms
print.css
18 ms
silc.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
silc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
silc.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
silc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Silc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: