7.6 sec in total
2.7 sec
4.7 sec
122 ms
Visit silgar.net now to see the best up-to-date Sil Gar content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about silgar.net
. | Fachadas Ventiladas Aluminio y Metálicas | Muros Cortina Vidrio| SilGar -
Visit silgar.netWe analyzed Silgar.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
silgar.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
2705 ms
166 ms
164 ms
167 ms
408 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Silgar.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Silgar.net.
Page size can be reduced by 479.2 kB (55%)
870.3 kB
391.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Silgar.net main page is 870.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 480.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sil Gar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 343.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 343.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silgar.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (66%)
58
20
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sil Gar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
silgar.net
2705 ms
default.css
166 ms
default.css
164 ms
default.css
167 ms
jquery.js
408 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
168 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
478 ms
architec.js
430 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
329 ms
contact.js
327 ms
noie6.js
329 ms
topslide.js
493 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
572 ms
jquery.form-defaults.js
493 ms
jQuerytools.js
568 ms
jquery.gridnav.js
650 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
714 ms
jquery.dwFadingLinks.js
648 ms
jquery.effects.core.js
733 ms
jquery.style-my-tooltips.js
729 ms
jquery.scrolltotop.js
730 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
892 ms
js
29 ms
jquery.tweet.js
811 ms
history.js
954 ms
default.css
1012 ms
style.css
913 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
912 ms
default_dark.css
975 ms
comment-reply.js
985 ms
columns.css
84 ms
features.css
102 ms
reset.css
162 ms
prettyPhoto.css
241 ms
projects.css
165 ms
typography.css
197 ms
news.css
244 ms
nivo-slider.css
260 ms
blog.css
319 ms
tweet.css
325 ms
staticmap
48 ms
loading.gif
82 ms
bgtopslide.jpg
164 ms
btntopslide_open_dark.png
163 ms
btntopslide_close2.png
164 ms
silgar4.png
247 ms
btnsearch_dark.png
166 ms
stronglineleft_dark.png
240 ms
bgcontent2.png
321 ms
muros-cortina.jpg
566 ms
fachada-composite.jpg
457 ms
fachada-metalica.jpg
408 ms
lineleft_dark.png
396 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
up.png
381 ms
btnhover_dark.png
462 ms
collect
13 ms
arrows.png
163 ms
points.png
162 ms
silgar.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
silgar.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
silgar.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silgar.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silgar.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
silgar.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sil Gar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: