Tools & Wizards About Us
silkscreeningexpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

silkscreeningexpress.com

EmbroiderPrint - Custom Silk Screening and Embroidery

Page Load Speed

528 ms in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

510 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

silkscreeningexpress.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to silkscreeningexpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Silk Screening Express best content right away, or after learning these important things about silkscreeningexpress.com

Quality custom silk screening and embroidery Low Cost, Good Prices, Free Shipping. Free quotes or estimate for your custom silk screen or embroidery.

Visit silkscreeningexpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Silkscreeningexpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 510 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

silkscreeningexpress.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

silkscreeningexpress.com

18 ms

www.embroiderprint.com

56 ms

style.min.css

12 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

12 ms

css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Silkscreeningexpress.com, 93% (26 requests) were made to Embroiderprint.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (56 ms) relates to the external source Embroiderprint.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.3 kB (40%)

Content Size

180.0 kB

After Optimization

108.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Silkscreeningexpress.com main page is 180.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 79.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 55.7 kB

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 79.1 kB
  • After minification 79.1 kB
  • After compression 68.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 31.9 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 27.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silkscreeningexpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (92%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silk Screening Express. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

silkscreeningexpress.com

silkscreeningexpress.com

18 ms

www.embroiderprint.com

www.embroiderprint.com

56 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

12 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

bootstrap-grid.min.css

12 ms

css

css

27 ms

front.css

front.css

15 ms

styles.css

styles.css

14 ms

styles.css

styles.css

17 ms

styles.css

styles.css

16 ms

styles.css

styles.css

16 ms

styles.css

styles.css

18 ms

slick.css

slick.css

18 ms

styles.css

styles.css

19 ms

styles.css

styles.css

19 ms

styles.css

styles.css

17 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

20 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

18 ms

view.min.js

view.min.js

19 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

18 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

18 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

18 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

19 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

34 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

35 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

33 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

34 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

34 ms

wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js

wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

silkscreeningexpress.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

silkscreeningexpress.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

silkscreeningexpress.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silkscreeningexpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silkscreeningexpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

silkscreeningexpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: